MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2027831463 · doi:10.1353/ecf.0.0025

Two French Libertine Novels: “The Story of Madame de Luz” and “The Confessions of the Comte de ***,” (review)

2008· article· en· W2027831463 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ruth P. Thomas

Bibliographic record

VenueEighteenth-Century Fiction · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Art and Culture Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReignMemoirGermanArtLiteraturePoliticsFavouriteArt historyClassicsPhilosophyTheologyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Two French Libertine Novels: “The Story of Madame de Luz” and “The Confessions of the Comte de ***,” Ruth P. Thomas (bio) Charles Pinot-Duclos. Two French Libertine Novels: “The Story of Madame de Luz” and “The Confessions of the Comte de ***,” trans. and intro. Douglas Parmée. Brooklyn: AMS Press, 2006. xxvi+192 pp. US$64.50. ISBN 978-0-404-63546-6. For his contemporaries, Charles Pinot-Duclos (1704–72) was a prominent figure in eighteenth-century French life and letters. A habitué of the aristocratic salons, where he was welcomed in spite of his plebeian origins (his father was a hat maker), he also frequented the literary and political cafés, mingling with the intellectuals and artists of his era. Witty, known for his blunt, even coarse, speech, and well connected, he held a number of official positions: Secretary of the Académie française and Royal Historiographer, in addition to, briefly, public office as mayor of Dinan, where he was born. A prolific writer, Duclos penned memoirs and histories on subjects as diverse as the reign of Louis xi and the origins of the French language. He also wrote plays and fiction. The Story of Madame de Luz was widely read, and The Confessions of the Comte de *** was one of the most published and read novels of the eighteenth century, with eight editions during the first year and translations into English and German. The nineteenth century recognized Duclos as a historian and moralist—and Stendhal considered him his favourite author—but his novels (like many written during his era) were less appreciated. The rediscovery of the eighteenth-century novel towards the middle of the twentieth century, canonized in a Pléiade edition, has lead to a reconsideration of Duclos as a novelist of manners who observes and analyses his own society in order to understand the pro found significance of human social experience. Most recently, the interest in libertine novels—the anthologies of Raymond Trousson and Patrick Wald Lasowski, the [End Page 597] latter’s again in a Pléiade edition, and the critical studies of Claude Reichler, Colette Cazenobe, and others, as well as Nancy K. Miller, who compares the libertine and sentimental novel—has fixed critical attention on Duclos. So a new translation of his first two novels seems particularly timely. While the term libertin was used in the seventeenth century to describe free thinkers who challenged religious and moral codes, the eighteenth-century libertine novel is associated with amorous and licentious behaviour. Responding to and defying the social constraints of the ancien régime, the libertine novel takes a variety of forms from the Regency to the Revolution, from Crébillon fils to Sade, and ranges from the philosophical to the pornographic. The common dominator is the search for pleasure, linked to the will for power and the satisfaction of the ego. Male-authored libertine novels insist on male privilege, and they record seduction and betrayal most often in an aristocratic and worldly milieu. Women, however, are not always victims: libertinage has been compared to a game among equals. The Confessions of the Comte de *** (1741) is in many ways prototypical. Using the popular convention of the memoir novel, the mature hero, like those of Crébillon and Marivaux, looks back with irony on the “folly and errors” (84) of his youth. He presents his tale as a moral lesson and peppers his account with maxims recalling those of La Rochefoucauld, as he chronicles for a young relative his twenty-year career as un homme à la mode and lists the women who have participated in his sexual and social education. His brief portraits have been compared to the Caractères of La Bruyère, although his contemporaries identified some of the characters (for example, Mme de Tonins, who is described along with her salon, is generally considered to be modelled on Mme de Tencin). No real seduction occurs, since the hero picks women whose conquest is certain, nor does he linger on descriptions of pleasure, for all his liaisons are basically the same. The Count becomes more introspective and altruistic in the second part of the novel. He tries to convince...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEighteenth-Century FictionSame topicHistorical Art and Culture StudiesFrench-language works237,207