Creating Market Socialism: How Ordinary People Are Shaping Class and Status in China (review)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: Creating Market Socialism: How Ordinary People Are Shaping Class and Status in China Qichun Chen (bio) Carolyn L. Hsu. Creating Market Socialism: How Ordinary People Are Shaping Class and Status in China. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2007. 225 pp. Hardcover $74.95, isbn 978-0-8223-4017-1. This book is about how people in China after market reform develop novel practices, as articulated in their narratives, to improve their social status, and how these practices become institutionalized over time to shape the formation of class and status in China. The author argues that the belief that using one of the four kinds of capital (political capital, economic capital, human capital, and social capital) is instrumental to achieving high social status is widespread during certain periods in China. Such a conviction guides people's social practices. In turn, as those practices are repeated systematically by large numbers of people, they become institutionalized. The institutionalized practices determine a person's standing or social status and, over time, set the basic rules for producing the hierarchy in Chinese society. The author concludes that political capital was the key to achieving high social status before 1978, the year the Chinese central government launched the market. However, the value of political capital has since faded and has been replaced by an emphasis on human capital. This book has two parts. The first part, chapters 1 and 2, illuminates how institutionalized rules of attaining social status determine the social hierarchy in China, that is, how higher or lower statuses are formed. The second part explains how the practices of using four kinds of capital became institutionalized. The author draws much attention to using political capital before the Chinese market reform and the role of human capital in contemporary society. The author interviewed eighty-two working adults to collect "narratives" in Harbin, an industrial city in northeast China, using participation observation and open-ended interviews. These narratives pertain to people's views and practices regarding how different forms of capital affect their job search and life strategies. As the author indicates, her reason for choosing this city was to avoid atypical cases represented by the booming coastal cities. However, many economic, cultural, and other differences exist in China's cities. It is hard to argue that the case of Harbin is representative of the rest of urban China. The author's emphasis on the emerging importance of human capital in shaping China's contemporary social hierarchy may be overstated. The use of human capital is not the only institutionalized practice for achieving status in contemporary China. The use of social capital, as evident in gift exchanges and other reciprocities in the daily lives of people, has become a widespread and institutional means by which people bypass the onerous and often impenetrable official channels. Social capital can also determine a person's social standing, [End Page 566] and at times it even works more efficiently than human capital. Thus, social capital should be considered in conjunction with human capital in contemporary China. Hsu's book provides a new approach as it is based on ordinary people's social practices, which differs from many other studies that tend to dwell on political or economic elites exclusively. However, the reliance on the case of Harbin and the undue emphasis on human capital at the exclusion of social capital present some limitations to this novel study. [End Page 567] Qichun Chen Qichun Chen is a PhD candidate in the Department of Sociology at the University of Saskatchewan in Canada. Copyright © 2010 University of Hawai'i Press
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».