Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The Holy Qur'an states:All people we make men and women of you, we make you peoples and tribes so that you would come to know each other. Mankind we created you from a male and female and made you into peoples and tribes so that you might come to know each other, not that you may despise each other.The definition of for me is that it is a private contract with my Creator. I obtain my values from the Qur'an which I then translate into the way that I conduct myself, both personally and professionally.The dictionary definition of religious pluralism refers to an attitude which allows one to overcome religious differences between different religions and conflicts within the same religion.So in most religious traditions, religious pluralism is essentially based on a view of one's religious traditions while allowing for respect to be engendered between different traditions on core principles.For me personally, is an ever-evolving concept. How people define themselves according to their is ever-evolving, and in today's global landscape, negotiating different religions within boundaries requires a very delicate balance. However, at the essence of every religion, whether you are Jewish, Christian, Muslim, Buddhist, or Hindu, is spirituality. That spirituality exists in every soul, no matter what you are practicing, what faith you are following, what ethnicity you are born into, what language you are speaking, or which God you are praying to. We all share the essence of spirituality in our soul.When I was a young child, my mother always told me that God exists in each person and in each soul there is a God. If you hurt that person, you are hurting God. My belief is that we all practice a kind of spirituality. We may define it differently, but we all have a sense of spirituality and in each person's soul resides our Creator.The topic today is religion confronts pluralism: today and tomorrow. For me to address this topic, I need to look at yesterday (the past) to see how we arrived at today (the present) and will proceed to tomorrow (the future).For me, yesterday (the past) is where I grew up and where I learned to appreciate the different religions of the world. And then today (the present): I would like to discuss with you how important it is that we as Canadians must sculpt what the future will look like. In Canada, we need to sculpt together some of the very difficult issues, some religious and some moral, and some issues that we face as communities, with the charter of rights and freedoms as a backdrop.And then as for tomorrow (the future) and the way our world will look: I believe each one of you is a leader in the issue of pluralism, and I will explain to you what I mean in a minute.As a child I was always brought up to appreciate all religions, but I didn't really understand it. When I enrolled my daughter, Farzana, in a Catholic religious school in Vancouver, the principal of the school asked Farzana if she would mind studying the Catholic faith. She looked at him and told him that she looked forward to learning more about Catholicism and Christianity.I have to admit to you I was a little floored by that answer. Later, as delicately as I could, I asked her, Where did you learn to answer that way? How did you learn that answer? (I was also asking myself why, if I had issues about Christianity, was I enrolling her in a Catholic school?)She gave me an answer that really educated me. Farzana said to me, You know, we learn about Jesus Christ in our religion, so I want to learn Christian beliefs and values.She became such a good religious student that she was placed in an advanced placement class in religion. My family kept saying, That's for nuns-that's the level where one becomes a nun-what are you doing? Are you thinking of converting? Farzana said to me, Mom, you don't understand. Catholics practice the same rituals in mass that we do in the mosque but my friends don't go to church as often as we do, so I know the rituals better than they do! …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».