Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Holy Qur'an states:All people we make men and women of you, we make you peoples and tribes so that you would come to know each other. Mankind we created you from a male and female and made you into peoples and tribes so that you might come to know each other, not that you may despise each other.The definition of for me is that it is a private contract with my Creator. I obtain my values from the Qur'an which I then translate into the way that I conduct myself, both personally and professionally.The dictionary definition of religious pluralism refers to an attitude which allows one to overcome religious differences between different religions and conflicts within the same religion.So in most religious traditions, religious pluralism is essentially based on a view of one's religious traditions while allowing for respect to be engendered between different traditions on core principles.For me personally, is an ever-evolving concept. How people define themselves according to their is ever-evolving, and in today's global landscape, negotiating different religions within boundaries requires a very delicate balance. However, at the essence of every religion, whether you are Jewish, Christian, Muslim, Buddhist, or Hindu, is spirituality. That spirituality exists in every soul, no matter what you are practicing, what faith you are following, what ethnicity you are born into, what language you are speaking, or which God you are praying to. We all share the essence of spirituality in our soul.When I was a young child, my mother always told me that God exists in each person and in each soul there is a God. If you hurt that person, you are hurting God. My belief is that we all practice a kind of spirituality. We may define it differently, but we all have a sense of spirituality and in each person's soul resides our Creator.The topic today is religion confronts pluralism: today and tomorrow. For me to address this topic, I need to look at yesterday (the past) to see how we arrived at today (the present) and will proceed to tomorrow (the future).For me, yesterday (the past) is where I grew up and where I learned to appreciate the different religions of the world. And then today (the present): I would like to discuss with you how important it is that we as Canadians must sculpt what the future will look like. In Canada, we need to sculpt together some of the very difficult issues, some religious and some moral, and some issues that we face as communities, with the charter of rights and freedoms as a backdrop.And then as for tomorrow (the future) and the way our world will look: I believe each one of you is a leader in the issue of pluralism, and I will explain to you what I mean in a minute.As a child I was always brought up to appreciate all religions, but I didn't really understand it. When I enrolled my daughter, Farzana, in a Catholic religious school in Vancouver, the principal of the school asked Farzana if she would mind studying the Catholic faith. She looked at him and told him that she looked forward to learning more about Catholicism and Christianity.I have to admit to you I was a little floored by that answer. Later, as delicately as I could, I asked her, Where did you learn to answer that way? How did you learn that answer? (I was also asking myself why, if I had issues about Christianity, was I enrolling her in a Catholic school?)She gave me an answer that really educated me. Farzana said to me, You know, we learn about Jesus Christ in our religion, so I want to learn Christian beliefs and values.She became such a good religious student that she was placed in an advanced placement class in religion. My family kept saying, That's for nuns-that's the level where one becomes a nun-what are you doing? Are you thinking of converting? Farzana said to me, Mom, you don't understand. Catholics practice the same rituals in mass that we do in the mosque but my friends don't go to church as often as we do, so I know the rituals better than they do! …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".