MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2030229665 · doi:10.1353/tj.0.0339

Historical Dictionary of African American Theater (review)

2010· article· en· W2030229665 sur OpenAlex
Sandra M. Mayo

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueTheatre Journal · 2010
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueRace, History, and American Society
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMusicalHarlem RenaissancePerformance artHistoryArt historyAfrican americanPerforming artsComedyThe artsArtLiteratureClassicsVisual arts

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Historical Dictionary of African American Theater Sandra M. Mayo Historical Dictionary of African American Theater. By Anthony D. Hill, with Douglas Q. Barnett. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press, 2009; pp. 542. $115.00 cloth. Anthony Hill and Douglas Barnett provide theatre practitioners, scholars, and all manner of theatre enthusiasts with a comprehensive, up-to-date reference in their Historical Dictionary of African American Theater, which chronicles nearly 200 years of black theatre in the United States, from 1816 to 2008. Hill’s work is enhanced by his previous publications, such as Pages from the Harlem Renaissance (1996); Barnett’s experience as writer, director, actor, and founder of Black Arts/West in Seattle complements Hill’s more academic perspective. Hill and Barnett are the sole authors of the entries—a monumental undertaking. A brief, informative chronology of African American theatre highlights (e.g., the debut performance of the Williams and Walker musical comedy team in 1899), as well as related historical moments (e.g., the 1922 House of Representatives anti-lynching bill) precedes the body of the Dictionary. The introduction covers four periods: the 1810s through 1940s; the 1950s and ’60s; the 1970s and ’80s; and, finally, the 1990s to 2008. This periodization aligns well with black theatre activity, charting its development from a small number of playwrights, theatres, and actors in the nineteenth century through an explosion of work during the Harlem Renaissance and the Second Black Renaissance during the 1960s and ’70s, to the ascendancy of August Wilson, George C. Wolfe, and Tyler Perry during the 1980s and ’90s and the avant-garde work of Suzan-Lori Parks in the millennium. Thus the introduction, and the Dictionary as a whole, best serves the contemporary scholar. The core of the work, the dictionary itself with over 600 entries, is perhaps more historically balanced than the introduction. Entries for individuals focus on biographical sketches and career highlights; oddly, the authors made the unusual, sometimes troubling choice to omit birthdates for living individuals. Given the complex multicultural background of African Americans, deciding who belongs in the dictionary must have been a challenge. The authors apparently aimed for inclusion, with entries on mixed-race and white writers who have made an exceptional contribution to the field (they do not, however, clarify their selection criteria for directors and actors). The entries on plays and musicals offer brief plot summaries and production histories. Although black musicals have long been popular, the Dictionary focuses on serious dramas, with only a sprinkling of comedies. Regrettably critics and designers are not included. No special thematic development emerges from the selections; however, focusing on one type of entry at a time is illuminating. For example, salient parallels can be found in the struggles and triumphs of black theatre organizations from the earliest to the most recent. The entries on the Negro Ensemble Company, the New Lafayette Theatre, and the Free Southern Theatre are among the strongest in the collection. As a scholar who specializes in black theatre, I was informed and renewed on every page. I enjoyed refreshing my knowledge of the accomplishments of actor Canada Lee—whose success in Native Son on Broadway in 1941 was remarkable. Scanning down the page, I was also pleased to see an entry on Texas playwright and actor Eugene Lee, best-known for his performances in August Wilson’s plays (although this entry is not up-to-date in the listing of Lee’s plays and misrepresents him as a director). Some surprises include the detailed entries on Willis Richardson, Alice Childress (indeed, she gets more space than either Lorraine Hansberry or Suzan-Lori Parks), and Langston Hughes, detailing his dramatic output beyond Black Nativity, his most produced work. I was surprised to discover that Lynn Hamilton did not just play Redd Foxx’s girlfriend on Sanford and Son, but also had a long and successful career as a serious dramatic actor in the theatre and on screen. The entry on playwright Robert Alexander reminded me of his amazing output of first-rate works. Discussions of recurring themes in black theatre, from assimilation, civil rights, religion, miscegenation, and slavery to protest, manhood, and women’s issues are added benefits of Hill...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,783
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,011
Tête enseignante GPT0,278
Écart entre enseignants0,267 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle