MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2031645460 · doi:10.1353/oas.2012.0035

Erinnerungen eines Hollywoodstars aus Ungarn by Charles Korvin (review)

2012· article· de· W2031645460 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Laura A. Detre

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Austrian studies · 2012
Typearticle
Languede
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueEuropean history and politics
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHollywoodArt historyEmigrationArtHumanitiesPolitical scienceLaw

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Erinnerungen eines Hollywoodstars aus Ungarn by Charles Korvin Laura A. Detre Charles Korvin, Erinnerungen eines Hollywoodstars aus Ungarn. Vienna: Synema/Gesellschaft für Film und Medien, 2012. 37 pp. In the 1930s and 1940s Hollywood became a destination for people working in film around the world, but it held a particular attraction for Europeans. We are all aware of the most famous examples—Marlene Dietrich, Otto Preminger, Hedy Lamarr, and so on—but there were hundreds of others working in American film during this time, and they did much to shape the developing industry. One of those less-known actors was Charles Korvin, the author of a brief autobiography recently published in Austria by Synema/Gesellschaft für Film und Medien. This text, which was originally included in the book Aufb ruch ins Ungewisse: Österreichische Filmschaffende in der Emigration vor [End Page 174] 1945, gives us some insight into Korvin’s life and work, and he stands as a case study of many of the major aspects of twentieth-century history. For the most part, Europeans who came to work in the American film industry in the 1930s can be divided into two groups, those who came because the United States was rapidly becoming the center of the commercial film world and those who came to avoid oppression in their home countries. Korvin technically fits into both categories; he expressed an interest in going to the United States as early as 1929 and spent the bulk of his early career working in London and Paris, which were often gateway cities for immigration to the United States. He finally did come to Hollywood in 1937, prompted by his work in the documentary Heart of Spain, which detailed the work of Canadian doctor Norman Bethune in the Spanish Civil War. Directing this film would shape Korvin’s future in ways that he could not have foretold at the time. In the short term, it meant that Korvin, whose Jewish heritage made working in Europe difficult to begin with, needed to find a new home. Later, after settling in the United States and building a relatively successful career as a Hollywood leading man, he found himself a victim of blacklisting. According to Korvin, it was only when Stanley Kramer cast him as the captain in his film Ship of Fools that Korvin knew that he was truly offthe blacklist. During the time that Korvin was not able to act in films, he turned to television to keep his career alive, as did many other actors who were excluded from film. This seems to have led to an interesting career in this new medium, culminating in a role in the 1978 TV miniseries Holocaust, a groundbreaking production that raised awareness of the Nazi genocide against the Jews and cemented the use of the term Holocaust to describe these events. My only critique of this book is its length; Charles Korvin had a fascinating life and career, and I would have liked to learn more about him. Of course, Synema could only work with the interviews and writings that Korvin left behind, but it is my sincere hope that someone will be inspired by this text and begin a more comprehensive project. This book should be of interest to anyone who studies the rise of fascism in Central Europe, émigré filmmakers in 1940s Hollywood, or McCarthyism in the United States. [End Page 175] Laura A. Detre Randolph-Macon College Copyright © 2013 Austrian Studies Association

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,072
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,092
Tête enseignante GPT0,359
Écart entre enseignants0,267 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2012
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of Austrian studiesMême sujetEuropean history and politicsTravaux en français237 207