MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2031645460 · doi:10.1353/oas.2012.0035

Erinnerungen eines Hollywoodstars aus Ungarn by Charles Korvin (review)

2012· article· de· W2031645460 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Laura A. Detre

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Austrian studies · 2012
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEuropean history and politics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHollywoodArt historyEmigrationArtHumanitiesPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Erinnerungen eines Hollywoodstars aus Ungarn by Charles Korvin Laura A. Detre Charles Korvin, Erinnerungen eines Hollywoodstars aus Ungarn. Vienna: Synema/Gesellschaft für Film und Medien, 2012. 37 pp. In the 1930s and 1940s Hollywood became a destination for people working in film around the world, but it held a particular attraction for Europeans. We are all aware of the most famous examples—Marlene Dietrich, Otto Preminger, Hedy Lamarr, and so on—but there were hundreds of others working in American film during this time, and they did much to shape the developing industry. One of those less-known actors was Charles Korvin, the author of a brief autobiography recently published in Austria by Synema/Gesellschaft für Film und Medien. This text, which was originally included in the book Aufb ruch ins Ungewisse: Österreichische Filmschaffende in der Emigration vor [End Page 174] 1945, gives us some insight into Korvin’s life and work, and he stands as a case study of many of the major aspects of twentieth-century history. For the most part, Europeans who came to work in the American film industry in the 1930s can be divided into two groups, those who came because the United States was rapidly becoming the center of the commercial film world and those who came to avoid oppression in their home countries. Korvin technically fits into both categories; he expressed an interest in going to the United States as early as 1929 and spent the bulk of his early career working in London and Paris, which were often gateway cities for immigration to the United States. He finally did come to Hollywood in 1937, prompted by his work in the documentary Heart of Spain, which detailed the work of Canadian doctor Norman Bethune in the Spanish Civil War. Directing this film would shape Korvin’s future in ways that he could not have foretold at the time. In the short term, it meant that Korvin, whose Jewish heritage made working in Europe difficult to begin with, needed to find a new home. Later, after settling in the United States and building a relatively successful career as a Hollywood leading man, he found himself a victim of blacklisting. According to Korvin, it was only when Stanley Kramer cast him as the captain in his film Ship of Fools that Korvin knew that he was truly offthe blacklist. During the time that Korvin was not able to act in films, he turned to television to keep his career alive, as did many other actors who were excluded from film. This seems to have led to an interesting career in this new medium, culminating in a role in the 1978 TV miniseries Holocaust, a groundbreaking production that raised awareness of the Nazi genocide against the Jews and cemented the use of the term Holocaust to describe these events. My only critique of this book is its length; Charles Korvin had a fascinating life and career, and I would have liked to learn more about him. Of course, Synema could only work with the interviews and writings that Korvin left behind, but it is my sincere hope that someone will be inspired by this text and begin a more comprehensive project. This book should be of interest to anyone who studies the rise of fascism in Central Europe, émigré filmmakers in 1940s Hollywood, or McCarthyism in the United States. [End Page 175] Laura A. Detre Randolph-Macon College Copyright © 2013 Austrian Studies Association

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.092
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Austrian studiesSame topicEuropean history and politicsFrench-language works237,207