Notice bibliographique
Résumé
My task in the Society for Historians of American Foreign Relations panel on Death of the Nation State? was to examine the difficult, yet fascinating theme of the complex and controversial relationships that exist between Quebecois and American cultures. This is only the first phase of a larger and more thorough analysis of the socioeconomic interaction between these cultures. From the start, it is important to underscore that this paper is not based upon statistical evidence--rather, it offers an overview of the creative cultural processes now happening in Quebec society. The paper furthermore reflects study and observations on diverse Quebecois cultural productions, such as cinema, music, literature, theatre, and dance. By deconstructing the Quebecois Social Imaginary, I will suggest how the particular relationship that Quebec has developed with the American cultural reality not only differs from that between Anglo-Canadian society and the United States, but also has acquired a unique configuration over t ime. (1) The main focus of this analysis will be on understanding how (l'Americanite) has been integrated into Quebec's collective Social Imaginary. It is important to stress that the American influence on Quebecois cultural identity has always been a very important, yet divisive issue in Quebec's cultural, social, and political reality. The acceptance of American influence by the urban working-class masses was doubled because of its fierce rejection by the rural masses and their traditional elites. The urban masses saw America's influence as a tool of emancipation from the conservative ideological hold of that past. The rural masses and their elites, on the other hand, saw this as a negative, regressive influence that was evil, morally corrupt and, overall, dangerous to Quebec's identity and cultural survivability. It is important to stress that, while Quebecois society has always been critical of and reluctant about the Americanization of Quebec, Americanity was recognized even though its acceptance ge nerated a fierce and lengthy debate through modern Quebec history. This particular characteristic of Quebec's culture puts it in a different cultural space than the rest of Canada, which tries to build an identity to resist American cultural influence. Contrary to Anglo-Canadian culture, which tries to insulate itself from its Americanity, Quebecois society, especially since the 1950s, has accepted, integrated and, in many ways, bypassed this question, which continues to haunt Anglo-Canadian society and its elites. A creative political tension has always prevailed in Quebec concerning this particular aspect of its reality. This tension stems from the dialogue between the forces that fought in order to bring Quebecois culture to accept the American component of its identity, and those who insisted on keeping Quebec outside of the continental cultural sphere. I also wish to underline that the topic of Quebecois culture's particular rapport with American culture remains at worst an unknown dimension (especially for a non-Quebecois public), and at best immersed in and/or subordinated to the topic of Quebec's politics. It also seems that the only time Quebecois culture draws the attention of the international (that is, non-Francophone) media is when the question of Quebec's possible separation from Canada comes to the forefront, as it did most recently with the October 1995 Referendum on independence. Discussing Quebecois culture implies, therefore, the acknowledgment and the necessity of moving beyond this political determinism, which renders peripheral other important aspects of its social reality. And although it is very hard to transcend the political question, which has mobilized the passions, not only of Quebec's population, but also of the rest of Canada, the imperative to understand Quebec society's totality remains an important task. This importance stems from the fact that most of the partisan political arguments concerning Qubecois distinctiveness as a society are based on the belief that Quebecois culture is different from the culture that prevails in the rest of Canada. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».