MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2033445374 · doi:10.1353/can.0.0217

Like the Sound of a Drum: Aboriginal Cultural Politics in Denendeh and Nunavut (review)

2009· article· en· W2033445374 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Ken Coates

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian Historical Review · 2009
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiqueIndigenous Studies and Ecology
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPoliticsIndigenousGovernment (linguistics)LegislatureHuman settlementPower (physics)AutonomyPolitical scienceSociologyHistoryEthnologyLawArchaeology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Like the Sound of a Drum: Aboriginal Cultural Politics in Denendeh and Nunavut Ken Coates Like the Sound of a Drum: Aboriginal Cultural Politics in Denendeh and Nunavut. Peter Kulchyski. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press, 2005. Pp. 312, $26.95 paper The Canadian North is in the midst of an important political revolution in national history. Only thirty years ago, the Yukon and Northwest Territories were governed as federal colonies. Aboriginal people played relatively minor political roles, the hand of the federal government was omnipresent, and meaningful regional autonomy seemed a long way off. With stunning speed, the government of Canada granted responsible government, negotiated Aboriginal claims settlements, expanded the powers of Indigenous self-government, and created the Inuit-controlled territory of Nunavut. Aboriginal leaders emerged both as important national figures and key players in the administration and planning of the territorial North. Peter Kulchyski has been a leading observer of this transformation. Like the Sound of a Drum is the most important contribution yet to the understanding of the nature and extent of this political transition. Through a comparative study of Fort Simpson and Fort Good Hope in the Northwest Territories and Pangnirtung in Nunavut, the author describes fundamental changes in northern politics. He moves well beyond a discussion of political structures and legislative changes to explain the deep cultural roots of the reorganization of power in the North. This is a theoretically informed, strongly argued, and insightfully researched book, one that will no doubt set the standard for scholars seeking to explore the intersection of political aspirations, Aboriginal culture, and political systems in Canada. Kulchyski builds his work around four main arguments. First, he argues that the ‘politics of form’ are of crucial importance in understanding Aboriginal communities in transition, as northern peoples resist the imposition of external political systems. He dismisses the assertion that northerners have to be ‘prepared’ for Aboriginal self-government [End Page 586] and says they are ready for these responsibilities, and on their own terms. Kulchyski makes clear his assumptions about the role of the state: ‘The State’s objective, aside from the wishes of its individual agents, is to find a mechanism to incorporate Aboriginal peoples into the dominant order. This is a structural exigency and will never cease as long as the dominant order depends on the logic of capital accumulation and the expansion of the commodity form’ (16). He found that Aboriginal people ‘experience the State as ruthless, unrelenting, totalizing machinery’ (16–17). His fourth argument is that there is a substantial chasm in language, communication, and core values between Aboriginal people and the state – he calls these structures ‘writing’ – and that meaningful negotiations requires the ability of both sides to bridge the divide. More directly, he asserts that Aboriginal people should not have to conform to the dictates of the state. Like the Sound of a Drum has much to recommend it. Kulchyski weaves in the book a sophisticated left-liberal analysis of the nature of Aboriginal governance and the role of the dominant society, capitalism, and democracy, a well-informed assessment of the state of play in northern, community-level politics, and an eloquent series of vignettes of his encounters with the realities of northern cultural politics. Scholars from many fields will find a great deal of value in his engagement with the theoretical and conceptual literature relating to Aboriginal cultures in transition. Chapter 6 offers a challenging evaluation of the leading arguments about self-government by Canadian academics and the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples; the discussion of Alan Cairns’s work is particularly noteworthy. One hopes that Kulchysky’s conclusions will be tested in other settings – the Yukon and the northern provinces, in particular – and that a similar kind of evaluation will be undertaken of the nature of the national and territorial bureaucracies. In completing the important and admirable task of revealing the nuances, strengths, and substance of Aboriginal politics, Kulchysky has worked from a very stereotypic description of the role of the state, without the sensitivity and depth that he has provided for Indigenous political cultures. Kulchysky has succeeded admirably in the tasks he set for himself. The book provides an effective introduction...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,881
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,237

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0030,007
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0020,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0050,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,043
Tête enseignante GPT0,380
Écart entre enseignants0,337 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2009
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCanadian Historical Review→Même sujetIndigenous Studies and Ecology→Travaux en français237 207→