MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2033445374 · doi:10.1353/can.0.0217

Like the Sound of a Drum: Aboriginal Cultural Politics in Denendeh and Nunavut (review)

2009· article· en· W2033445374 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Ken Coates

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Historical Review · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicIndigenous Studies and Ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoliticsIndigenousGovernment (linguistics)LegislatureHuman settlementPower (physics)AutonomyPolitical scienceSociologyHistoryEthnologyLawArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Like the Sound of a Drum: Aboriginal Cultural Politics in Denendeh and Nunavut Ken Coates Like the Sound of a Drum: Aboriginal Cultural Politics in Denendeh and Nunavut. Peter Kulchyski. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press, 2005. Pp. 312, $26.95 paper The Canadian North is in the midst of an important political revolution in national history. Only thirty years ago, the Yukon and Northwest Territories were governed as federal colonies. Aboriginal people played relatively minor political roles, the hand of the federal government was omnipresent, and meaningful regional autonomy seemed a long way off. With stunning speed, the government of Canada granted responsible government, negotiated Aboriginal claims settlements, expanded the powers of Indigenous self-government, and created the Inuit-controlled territory of Nunavut. Aboriginal leaders emerged both as important national figures and key players in the administration and planning of the territorial North. Peter Kulchyski has been a leading observer of this transformation. Like the Sound of a Drum is the most important contribution yet to the understanding of the nature and extent of this political transition. Through a comparative study of Fort Simpson and Fort Good Hope in the Northwest Territories and Pangnirtung in Nunavut, the author describes fundamental changes in northern politics. He moves well beyond a discussion of political structures and legislative changes to explain the deep cultural roots of the reorganization of power in the North. This is a theoretically informed, strongly argued, and insightfully researched book, one that will no doubt set the standard for scholars seeking to explore the intersection of political aspirations, Aboriginal culture, and political systems in Canada. Kulchyski builds his work around four main arguments. First, he argues that the ‘politics of form’ are of crucial importance in understanding Aboriginal communities in transition, as northern peoples resist the imposition of external political systems. He dismisses the assertion that northerners have to be ‘prepared’ for Aboriginal self-government [End Page 586] and says they are ready for these responsibilities, and on their own terms. Kulchyski makes clear his assumptions about the role of the state: ‘The State’s objective, aside from the wishes of its individual agents, is to find a mechanism to incorporate Aboriginal peoples into the dominant order. This is a structural exigency and will never cease as long as the dominant order depends on the logic of capital accumulation and the expansion of the commodity form’ (16). He found that Aboriginal people ‘experience the State as ruthless, unrelenting, totalizing machinery’ (16–17). His fourth argument is that there is a substantial chasm in language, communication, and core values between Aboriginal people and the state – he calls these structures ‘writing’ – and that meaningful negotiations requires the ability of both sides to bridge the divide. More directly, he asserts that Aboriginal people should not have to conform to the dictates of the state. Like the Sound of a Drum has much to recommend it. Kulchyski weaves in the book a sophisticated left-liberal analysis of the nature of Aboriginal governance and the role of the dominant society, capitalism, and democracy, a well-informed assessment of the state of play in northern, community-level politics, and an eloquent series of vignettes of his encounters with the realities of northern cultural politics. Scholars from many fields will find a great deal of value in his engagement with the theoretical and conceptual literature relating to Aboriginal cultures in transition. Chapter 6 offers a challenging evaluation of the leading arguments about self-government by Canadian academics and the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples; the discussion of Alan Cairns’s work is particularly noteworthy. One hopes that Kulchysky’s conclusions will be tested in other settings – the Yukon and the northern provinces, in particular – and that a similar kind of evaluation will be undertaken of the nature of the national and territorial bureaucracies. In completing the important and admirable task of revealing the nuances, strengths, and substance of Aboriginal politics, Kulchysky has worked from a very stereotypic description of the role of the state, without the sensitivity and depth that he has provided for Indigenous political cultures. Kulchysky has succeeded admirably in the tasks he set for himself. The book provides an effective introduction...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.881
Threshold uncertainty score0.237

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.380
Teacher spread0.337 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Historical ReviewSame topicIndigenous Studies and EcologyFrench-language works237,207