A Mob of Lusty Villagers: Operations of Domestic Desires in Hannah Webster Foster's The Coquette
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
A Mob of Lusty Villagers: Operations of Domestic Desires in Hannah Webster Foster's The Coquette Elizabeth Dill Among themes ofliberty, virtue, and the construction ofnational identity explored in the literature of the early American republic , there is the difficult and seemingly less glorious fact that the canon suffers from a scandalous shortage ofprudes. Indeed, some of the most popular American texts during the late eighteenth century portray the virginity of their heroines only to highlight its untimely loss. Sensuous women populate the literature of the early nation, wrecking homes and seducing their seducers, and their presence calls for a discussion of what it means to be sexy in the 1790s. For even after decades of critical attention, the connections between the indiscreetwomen ofpost-revolutionary fiction and republican notions ofcommunity and virtue are unresolved. We continue to ask why it is that the earliest American novels concern themselves with pleasurehungry coquettes, seductive half-sisters, lovesick rakes, and the like: not a mob ofangry villagers threatening another bloody revolution, but a mob of lusty villagers, out to sow their wild oats and explore the social limits of desire. Because seduction plots were often used as a genre to examine this phenomenon, we might turn to them to find an answer to our inquiries. But rather than indicating simply the sexual ruin ofa woman seeking liberty outside marriage, seduction in the late eighteenth century engages the social ethics of desire. This EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY FICTION, Volume 15, Number 2,January 2003 256 EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY FICTION conception ofthe use ofseduction in the early American novel leads to further questions: why must the new nation struggle to come to terms with such unencumbered, sexualized, excessively ??aa/subjects? And where does the seduced woman, as an object and as an agent of desire, fit into our understanding of republican ideologies and the formation ofan American community? In Hannah Webster Foster's great seduction tale, The Coquette; or, The History ofEliza Wharton; A Novel; Founded on Fact (1797), it is the heroine's impulse to delay marriage until, as she says, "I have sowed all my wild oats" that offers some surprising answers to these questions .1 Based on the true story ofan upper-class Bostonian, Elizabeth Whitman, whose fatal seduction earned her national notoriety, the novel offers a fascinating look at the conditions that might lead a young woman to such an end.2 In The Coquette, all the typical elements ofa traditional seduction plot are provided: the ruined girl doomed to an early death, her stillborn babe, the reformed rake Peter Sanford, the righteous, rejected suitor Reverend Boyer, the mother crazed with grief, the friends who warn and then admonish. And yet the novel resists a simple reading. After all, it is ostensibly Eliza's own fault for giving in to temptation. But the interweaving ofEliza's vices and virtues ultimately inspires acceptance from her community. The seduced woman, a figure presumably representing the vice of coquetry, comes instead to represent civic virtue. A definition of the American self thus emerges out of power defined by sociability and desire, as The Coquettedramatizes the strengths and the vulnerabilities of the republic through the trials of a thirty-seven-year-old flirt. The aesthetic arising from resistance to the household as a private space—a resistance that defines coquetry in Foster's novel—understands desire as the source ofan agency operating within domesticity, where attraction creates an ideological climate ofsociability. We need then to consider more carefully the place ofdesire in relation to the republican household. Although The Coquette has attracted stacks of criticism regarding the relationship between liberty and coquetry, nearly all readers ofFoster's work de-emphasize or dismiss altogether Hannah Webster Foster, Tlie Coquette; 01, 'Hie Hisloiy ofEliza Wliaiton;A Novel; Founded on Fact (1797; NewYork: Penguin, 1996), p. 158. References are to this edition. Cathy N. Davidson, Revolution and the Word: The Rise of the Novel in America (New York: Oxford University Press, 1986). For the story ofElizabeth Whitman and its connection to The Coquette, see pp. 140-50. A MOB OF LUSTY VILLAGERS257 Eliza's physiological attractions as constitutive of her role as a woman ofthe Wharton household to which she returns...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».