MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2036079456 · doi:10.1353/utq.0.0051

Randolph Caldecott: His Books and Illustrations for Young Readers (review)

2008· article· en· W2036079456 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Leslie McGrath

Notice bibliographique

RevueUniversity of Toronto Quarterly · 2008
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueThemes in Literature Analysis
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPopularityPicture booksArt historyHistoryArtLiteraturePsychology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Randolph Caldecott: His Books and Illustrations for Young Readers Leslie Mcgrath Robert J. Desmarais . Randolph Caldecott: His Books and Illustrations for Young Readers. University of Alberta Libraries / University of Alberta Press. xviii, 118. $24.95 This book is the catalogue of an exhibit at the Bruce Peel Special Collections Library, at the University of Alberta, of materials from the personal collection of its rare books librarian Robert Desmarais, supplemented with a few items from the Bruce Peel Special Collection. It is well illustrated with clear images from the twenty-six books represented in the show. Desmarais's intent is to show that 'Caldecott was a pioneer in the way he beckoned his young readers with an innovative and engaging aesthetic approach to the picture book genre.' Although this is ambitious for the scope of the publication, Desmarais does provide some background in his twelve pages of introductory text, in which he describes the early life and artistic education and development of Caldecott, and his works for the young compared with those of his contemporaries, notably Walter Crane and Kate Greenaway. Desmarais criticizes Crane's book illustrations for their formality and [End Page 306] Greenaway's for their unrelieved prettiness, but fails to acknowledge their popularity. He states his opinions unsupported by evidence of children's preferences. His judgments are sometimes very broad: Desmarais may be correct to say that Caldecott 'achieved something unique by persuading young readers to identify with the non-human characters in his books,' but others had successfully made this attempt before him. Caldecott's achievements require a more detailed historical background to support Desmarais's claim. In the catalogue entries, Desmarais introduces Caldecott's works for the young with short descriptions of the texts, artistic techniques, and technologies. There is necessarily some repetition of technical detail in the entries. The notes about the texts are interesting but uneven in their treatment of historical background and literary content. The origin of some stories, like The Diverting History of John Gilpin, is described in detail, while that of others is not. For example, The Babes in the Wood is based upon a well-known and loved sixteenth-century ballad, but it is deemed here an odd selection for Caldecott to have illustrated, with hundreds of other nursery rhymes from which to choose. He makes no reference to the history of The Queen of Hearts. The description of the illustrations of Jackanapes does not do them justice: Desmarais writes that a 'child is seen riding a pony while his family looks on encouragingly. In a very explicit manner, Caldecott's illustrations give resounding encouragement to young readers to go out and have fun ... Caldecott is at his best with these lighthearted illustrations that speak directly to the innocent yearning of children to break free of the burdens connected with growing up.' This is, in fact, the story of Theodore, a boy of striking beauty who wants only to be a soldier like his deceased father, and who follows his fated inclinations to a youthful, heroic death in battle. He is eventually shot while riding his beloved pony, the one mentioned above. Caldecott's fine emblematic treatment of the theme lends a special poignancy to the tale, and it is the reason behind its unusually formal cover illustration. Desmarais gives only an outline of Caldecott's life and omits much of his legacy. Although he mentions a number of Caldecott's artistic colleagues and admirers, there is no discussion of his strong influence on Beatrix Potter, whose father bought Caldecott's drawings for her to study. No comment is made about the eponymous Caldecott Medal, established by the American Library Association in 1938, awarded annually in the United States for the year's most distinguished children's picture book. Desmarais provides notes and a list of works cited. He does not discuss the problems of identifying editions and bibliographic details of Caldecott's books, and provides only basic descriptions, without pagination or measurements. This is an attractive exhibit catalogue, containing useful information about the production of [End Page 307] Caldecott's books, but many of Desmarais's statements and generalizations about children are based upon opinion rather than...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,753
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,018
Tête enseignante GPT0,206
Écart entre enseignants0,188 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2008
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUniversity of Toronto QuarterlyMême sujetThemes in Literature AnalysisTravaux en français237 207