MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2036079456 · doi:10.1353/utq.0.0051

Randolph Caldecott: His Books and Illustrations for Young Readers (review)

2008· article· en· W2036079456 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Leslie McGrath

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Toronto Quarterly · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicThemes in Literature Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPopularityPicture booksArt historyHistoryArtLiteraturePsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Randolph Caldecott: His Books and Illustrations for Young Readers Leslie Mcgrath Robert J. Desmarais . Randolph Caldecott: His Books and Illustrations for Young Readers. University of Alberta Libraries / University of Alberta Press. xviii, 118. $24.95 This book is the catalogue of an exhibit at the Bruce Peel Special Collections Library, at the University of Alberta, of materials from the personal collection of its rare books librarian Robert Desmarais, supplemented with a few items from the Bruce Peel Special Collection. It is well illustrated with clear images from the twenty-six books represented in the show. Desmarais's intent is to show that 'Caldecott was a pioneer in the way he beckoned his young readers with an innovative and engaging aesthetic approach to the picture book genre.' Although this is ambitious for the scope of the publication, Desmarais does provide some background in his twelve pages of introductory text, in which he describes the early life and artistic education and development of Caldecott, and his works for the young compared with those of his contemporaries, notably Walter Crane and Kate Greenaway. Desmarais criticizes Crane's book illustrations for their formality and [End Page 306] Greenaway's for their unrelieved prettiness, but fails to acknowledge their popularity. He states his opinions unsupported by evidence of children's preferences. His judgments are sometimes very broad: Desmarais may be correct to say that Caldecott 'achieved something unique by persuading young readers to identify with the non-human characters in his books,' but others had successfully made this attempt before him. Caldecott's achievements require a more detailed historical background to support Desmarais's claim. In the catalogue entries, Desmarais introduces Caldecott's works for the young with short descriptions of the texts, artistic techniques, and technologies. There is necessarily some repetition of technical detail in the entries. The notes about the texts are interesting but uneven in their treatment of historical background and literary content. The origin of some stories, like The Diverting History of John Gilpin, is described in detail, while that of others is not. For example, The Babes in the Wood is based upon a well-known and loved sixteenth-century ballad, but it is deemed here an odd selection for Caldecott to have illustrated, with hundreds of other nursery rhymes from which to choose. He makes no reference to the history of The Queen of Hearts. The description of the illustrations of Jackanapes does not do them justice: Desmarais writes that a 'child is seen riding a pony while his family looks on encouragingly. In a very explicit manner, Caldecott's illustrations give resounding encouragement to young readers to go out and have fun ... Caldecott is at his best with these lighthearted illustrations that speak directly to the innocent yearning of children to break free of the burdens connected with growing up.' This is, in fact, the story of Theodore, a boy of striking beauty who wants only to be a soldier like his deceased father, and who follows his fated inclinations to a youthful, heroic death in battle. He is eventually shot while riding his beloved pony, the one mentioned above. Caldecott's fine emblematic treatment of the theme lends a special poignancy to the tale, and it is the reason behind its unusually formal cover illustration. Desmarais gives only an outline of Caldecott's life and omits much of his legacy. Although he mentions a number of Caldecott's artistic colleagues and admirers, there is no discussion of his strong influence on Beatrix Potter, whose father bought Caldecott's drawings for her to study. No comment is made about the eponymous Caldecott Medal, established by the American Library Association in 1938, awarded annually in the United States for the year's most distinguished children's picture book. Desmarais provides notes and a list of works cited. He does not discuss the problems of identifying editions and bibliographic details of Caldecott's books, and provides only basic descriptions, without pagination or measurements. This is an attractive exhibit catalogue, containing useful information about the production of [End Page 307] Caldecott's books, but many of Desmarais's statements and generalizations about children are based upon opinion rather than...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.753
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Toronto QuarterlySame topicThemes in Literature AnalysisFrench-language works237,207