MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2037461487 · doi:10.1353/utq.2007.0216

Household Politics: Montreal Families and Postwar Reconstruction (review)

2007· article· en· W2037461487 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Ann Porter

Notice bibliographique

RevueUniversity of Toronto Quarterly · 2007
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueCanadian Identity and History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPoliticsVisionGovernment (linguistics)WelfareSociologyPolitical sciencePolitical economyPublic administrationLaw

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Household Politics: Montreal Families and Postwar Reconstruction Ann Porter (bio) Magda Fahrni. Household Politics: Montreal Families and Postwar Reconstruction University of Toronto Press. x, 282. $29.95 Magda Fahrni has provided a most welcome addition to the literature on post–Second World War Canada. Fahrni's book, focusing on Montreal in the 1940s, makes a distinctive contribution through its emphasis on the activities of households. Fahrni argues that postwar reconstruction was not simply a policy imposed from the top by the federal government, but one also constructed 'down on the ground,' where households played a central role. As the title 'household politics' indicates, Fahrni contends that not only were visions of family critical to postwar reconstruction, but so too were the activities and politics both within and with respect to households. 'Household politics' from this perspective involved 'both the renegotiation of roles within the household ... and more particularly, the placing of household issues in the public sphere and on the formal political agenda.' Fahrni first examines social welfare provisions, documenting, for example, how the new federal benefits (including veterans' benefits and family allowances) affected the lives of individuals and families. One of Fahrni's central contentions, however, is that private agencies, voluntary associations, and religious organizations continued to play an important role, providing supplementary aid, and actively working to implement their own vision of reconstruction. A chapter on 'sustaining soldiers, veterans and their families' examines relationships between soldiers and their families, including efforts to reconstruct the family unit itself in the postwar period. While the family was viewed as an 'agent of postwar healing,' achieving the desired domestic harmony and social stability required considerable intervention on the part of both the state and institutions of civil society. This theme is further elaborated on in a chapter focusing on a group of 105 Catholic, working-class couples who participated in a mass marriage in Montreal's Delorimier Stadium in 1939 and whose lives were followed, over a fifteen-year period, by the Ligue ouvrière catholique. This chapter again demonstrates attempts to shape postwar family life; this time focusing on one particular Catholic association as it asserted its own version of postwar reconstruction, one that insisted upon the importance of family and religion, and upon the specific experiences of French-Canadian families. The final two chapters examine the demands of married women and the claims of fathers as they attempted to improve the conditions under which their families lived. The former took the form of consumer activism. In the latter case, Fahrni focuses on the Squatters' Movement of 1946–47 and the teachers' strike of 1949 to illustrate fathers' attempts to improve both housing and their children's education. Through these chapters Fahrni begins to peel back the outer layer to see the complex inner workings, uncertainties, tensions, and drama that [End Page 552] constituted the postwar era. The book challenges conventional views in a number of respects. While much of the literature emphasizes a postwar 'consensus,' and postwar social welfare as primarily a matter of state intervention, the picture Fahrni presents is one of a complex process involving not only the sometimes conflicting approaches of the federal, provincial, and local governments, but also private welfare providers, voluntary associations, church groups, and households. This was a period not so much of relative prosperity and 'high consumption' as of overcrowded housing and considerable deprivation. Further, the household relations Fahrni describes are themselves multifaceted and complex, involving infidelities and marital tensions, postwar hopes, marriages, and efforts to construct better lives. Institutions such as the family come across not as particularly 'natural,' but as feasible only with considerable intervention on the part of various bodies. While Fahrni emphasizes a contested process of reconstruction, what also comes through is a sense of active creation in which various forces, institutions, political, social, and familial groups participated and played their part. Viewed from the perspective of the current era of market forces and individual self-interest as driving forces, the notion of active reconstruction itself, and the extent to which a range of individuals, groups, and organizations actively participated in it – even if in conflicting ways – is striking. Overall Fahrni has provided a much more...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,697
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,603

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0020,008
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0020,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0160,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,007
Tête enseignante GPT0,192
Écart entre enseignants0,185 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2007
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUniversity of Toronto Quarterly→Même sujetCanadian Identity and History→Travaux en français237 207→