MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2037461487 · doi:10.1353/utq.2007.0216

Household Politics: Montreal Families and Postwar Reconstruction (review)

2007· article· en· W2037461487 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Ann Porter

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Toronto Quarterly · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoliticsVisionGovernment (linguistics)WelfareSociologyPolitical sciencePolitical economyPublic administrationLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Household Politics: Montreal Families and Postwar Reconstruction Ann Porter (bio) Magda Fahrni. Household Politics: Montreal Families and Postwar Reconstruction University of Toronto Press. x, 282. $29.95 Magda Fahrni has provided a most welcome addition to the literature on post–Second World War Canada. Fahrni's book, focusing on Montreal in the 1940s, makes a distinctive contribution through its emphasis on the activities of households. Fahrni argues that postwar reconstruction was not simply a policy imposed from the top by the federal government, but one also constructed 'down on the ground,' where households played a central role. As the title 'household politics' indicates, Fahrni contends that not only were visions of family critical to postwar reconstruction, but so too were the activities and politics both within and with respect to households. 'Household politics' from this perspective involved 'both the renegotiation of roles within the household ... and more particularly, the placing of household issues in the public sphere and on the formal political agenda.' Fahrni first examines social welfare provisions, documenting, for example, how the new federal benefits (including veterans' benefits and family allowances) affected the lives of individuals and families. One of Fahrni's central contentions, however, is that private agencies, voluntary associations, and religious organizations continued to play an important role, providing supplementary aid, and actively working to implement their own vision of reconstruction. A chapter on 'sustaining soldiers, veterans and their families' examines relationships between soldiers and their families, including efforts to reconstruct the family unit itself in the postwar period. While the family was viewed as an 'agent of postwar healing,' achieving the desired domestic harmony and social stability required considerable intervention on the part of both the state and institutions of civil society. This theme is further elaborated on in a chapter focusing on a group of 105 Catholic, working-class couples who participated in a mass marriage in Montreal's Delorimier Stadium in 1939 and whose lives were followed, over a fifteen-year period, by the Ligue ouvrière catholique. This chapter again demonstrates attempts to shape postwar family life; this time focusing on one particular Catholic association as it asserted its own version of postwar reconstruction, one that insisted upon the importance of family and religion, and upon the specific experiences of French-Canadian families. The final two chapters examine the demands of married women and the claims of fathers as they attempted to improve the conditions under which their families lived. The former took the form of consumer activism. In the latter case, Fahrni focuses on the Squatters' Movement of 1946–47 and the teachers' strike of 1949 to illustrate fathers' attempts to improve both housing and their children's education. Through these chapters Fahrni begins to peel back the outer layer to see the complex inner workings, uncertainties, tensions, and drama that [End Page 552] constituted the postwar era. The book challenges conventional views in a number of respects. While much of the literature emphasizes a postwar 'consensus,' and postwar social welfare as primarily a matter of state intervention, the picture Fahrni presents is one of a complex process involving not only the sometimes conflicting approaches of the federal, provincial, and local governments, but also private welfare providers, voluntary associations, church groups, and households. This was a period not so much of relative prosperity and 'high consumption' as of overcrowded housing and considerable deprivation. Further, the household relations Fahrni describes are themselves multifaceted and complex, involving infidelities and marital tensions, postwar hopes, marriages, and efforts to construct better lives. Institutions such as the family come across not as particularly 'natural,' but as feasible only with considerable intervention on the part of various bodies. While Fahrni emphasizes a contested process of reconstruction, what also comes through is a sense of active creation in which various forces, institutions, political, social, and familial groups participated and played their part. Viewed from the perspective of the current era of market forces and individual self-interest as driving forces, the notion of active reconstruction itself, and the extent to which a range of individuals, groups, and organizations actively participated in it – even if in conflicting ways – is striking. Overall Fahrni has provided a much more...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.697
Threshold uncertainty score0.603

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.008
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Toronto Quarterly→Same topicCanadian Identity and History→French-language works237,207→