The Effect of Truncated Collagenase Class I Isomers on Human Islet Isolation Outcome
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The insufficient consistency of enzyme blends is one of the main reasons for the low standardization of enzymatic isolation of human islets. Although manufacturers succeeded to provide purified products consisting solely of collagenase class I and II (CI and CII), and a complementary protease, such as neutral protease or thermolysin, these enzyme blends are still characterized by a lot-dependent variability (1). Previous retrospective analysis proposed that the efficiency of enzyme blends is mainly determined by the integrity of CI required to initiate effective cleavage of collagen fibers within the periinsular extracellular matrix (2–4). This notion is supported by the observation that degradation of CI is associated with the loss of at least one of the total two collagen-binding domains resulting in an isoform of 100 kDa that has a specific collagen-degrading activity of only 10% compared with intact (115 kDa) isomers (5). Because no prospective isolation study has been performed yet, the present investigation was aimed to clarify whether intact (CI-115) and truncated (CI-100) CI isomers are capable of participating in the release of islets from human pancreatic tissue. All enzymes were provided as a modular system by Serva/Nordmark (Heidelberg/Uetersen, Germany). The raw Clostridium histolyticum product was purified and chromatographically separated into fractions of tryptic-like activity, neutral protease, CI-115, and CI-100 that were recombined with purified CII at a CII-to-CI ratio of 0.7 (Fig. 1). Characterization by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography and the Wunsch assay demonstrated a purity of 92%, 93%, and 89% for Cl-115, Cl-100, and CII, and an amidolytic activity of 0.072, 0.074, and 8.5 4-phenylazobenzyloxycarbonyl-l- prolyl-l-leucylglycyl-prolyl-d-arginine U/ mg, respectively. All fractionated classes were produced from one single batch.FIGURE 1.: Mono-Q high-performance liquid chromatography analysis of the collagenase class I isomers of 100 kDa (class I-100, top) and 115 kDa (class l-115, middle), and collagenase class II (bottom) performed at a wavelength of 280 nm.The blends were supplemented with 1.5 U dimethyl-casein/g of neutral protease and 2.6 U benzoyl-l-arginine-ethyl-ester/g of tryptic-like activity, dissolved in 1.5 mL/g of Hank's balanced salt solution, and intraductally injected into research grade pancreata using a CII activity of 25 U 4-phenylazobenzyloxycarbonyl-l-prolyl-l-leucylglycyl-prolyl-d-arginine/g.islets were isolated as previously described (6). After culture for 2 to 3 days at 37°C, islets were assessed for insulin release during static glucose incubation (2 vs. 20 mM) and for viability (Syto 13/ethidium bromide). Donor age (57.8±4.5 vs. 58.9±3.8), body mass index (23.1±1.2 vs. 24.9±0.4), pancreas weight (60.4±8.6 g vs. 74.1 ±14.1 g), and cold ischemia time (18.4±4.1 hr vs. 14.7±3.3 hr) did not differ between CI-115 (n=8) and CI-100 (n=8) (mean±SE, not significant by Mann-Whitney U test). The proportion of male-to-female donors (3:5 vs. 5:3) and histidine-tryptophan- ketoglutarate to University of Wisconsin solution perfusion (3:5 vs. 2:6) were approximately the same in pancreata processed by means of CI-115 and CI-100 (not significant by Fisher's exact test). No significant differences were observed between CI-115 and CI-100 regarding recirculation time (28.0±2.2 min vs. 24.0±2.3 min), percentage of undigested tissue (8.1±1.1% vs. 12.5±2.0%) and embedded islets (15.0±2.2% vs. 15.3± 5.2%), purity (52.8±4.9% vs. 48.6± 8.9%), and islet yield per gram (2340±320 islet equivalent/g vs. 3010±640 islet equivalent/g) equivalent to a postpurification recovery of 50.7±9.1% and 64.6±7.8%, respectively. Islet morphology and size distribution were similar in both the experimental groups (data not shown). Islet survival (67.1%±7.5% vs. 64.6%±5.9%) and purity (48.5%±4.7% vs. 41.7%± 8.7%) determined postculture were also comparable. Quality assessment indicated no detrimental effect of CI-100 on islet viability (74.7±1.3 vs. 78.1±2.8), insulin content (331±103 μU/ng DNA vs. 255±93 μU/ng DNA), or glucose stimulation index (2.5±0.5 vs. 3.9±0.7) when compared with CI-115. The rapid release of islets from within acinar tissue using effective enzymes is of significant importance to recover islets from the harmful environment present during pancreas digestion to preserve morphologic and metabolic integrity. CI-100 seems to have the same capacity to dissociate human pancreatic tissue and to release islets as CI-115. This is in contrast to previous retrospective analysis (2, 3). Nevertheless, we cannot exclude that a potential deficiency of CI-100 to cleave collagen fibers in the perinsular extracellular matrix is compensated by complementary proteases, such as neutral protease, as demonstrated in rat islet isolation (7). A similar auxiliary function can be discussed for tryptic-like activity identified as clostripain (E.C. 3.4.22.8), which efficiently reduced digestion time in rat and human islet isolation (8). Most importantly, CI-100 was not associated with potential islet-harmful side effects as observed for other low-molecular-weight collagenase isomers that have been regularly removed from final collagenase NB1 preparations (9). This is supported by the observation that in vitro function, viability, or survival postculture was not reduced after CI-100 utilization. In conclusion, the present data indicate that the presence of collagenase CI-100 does not prevent successful islet isolations from the human pancreas. Whether this finding is related to a potential compensatory function of noncollagenolytic proteases has to be clarified in future studies using a model of marginal enzyme activities. Heide Brandhorst1 Sana Asif1 Karin Andersson1 Johanna Mönch2 Olaf Friedrich3 Nicole Rämsch-Günther2 Christian Rämsch3 Melanie Steffens2 Jörg Lambrecht3 Thomas Schräder3 Manfred Kurfürst3 Helene H. Andersson4 Marie Felldin5 Aksel Foss6 Kaija Salmela7 Annika Tibell8 Gunnar Tufveson9 Olle Korsgren1 Daniel Brandhorst1 1 Department of Oncology, Radiology, and Clinical Immunology Uppsala University Uppsala, Sweden 2 Serva Electrophoresis GmbH Uetersen, Germany 3 Nordmark Arzneimittel GmbH & Co. KG Uetersen, Germany 4 Department of Nephrology and Transplantation University Hospital Malmö, Sweden 5 Department of Transplantation University Hospital Gothenburg, Sweden 6 Division of Surgery, Section for Transplantation Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway 7 Division of Transplantation, Surgical Hospital Helsinki University Helsinki, Finland 8 Division of Transplantation Surgery, CLINTEC Karolinska Institute Stockholm, Sweden 9 Department of Surgical Sciences, Division of Transplantation Surgery Uppsala University Hospital Uppsala, Sweden
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».