The Effect of Truncated Collagenase Class I Isomers on Human Islet Isolation Outcome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The insufficient consistency of enzyme blends is one of the main reasons for the low standardization of enzymatic isolation of human islets. Although manufacturers succeeded to provide purified products consisting solely of collagenase class I and II (CI and CII), and a complementary protease, such as neutral protease or thermolysin, these enzyme blends are still characterized by a lot-dependent variability (1). Previous retrospective analysis proposed that the efficiency of enzyme blends is mainly determined by the integrity of CI required to initiate effective cleavage of collagen fibers within the periinsular extracellular matrix (2–4). This notion is supported by the observation that degradation of CI is associated with the loss of at least one of the total two collagen-binding domains resulting in an isoform of 100 kDa that has a specific collagen-degrading activity of only 10% compared with intact (115 kDa) isomers (5). Because no prospective isolation study has been performed yet, the present investigation was aimed to clarify whether intact (CI-115) and truncated (CI-100) CI isomers are capable of participating in the release of islets from human pancreatic tissue. All enzymes were provided as a modular system by Serva/Nordmark (Heidelberg/Uetersen, Germany). The raw Clostridium histolyticum product was purified and chromatographically separated into fractions of tryptic-like activity, neutral protease, CI-115, and CI-100 that were recombined with purified CII at a CII-to-CI ratio of 0.7 (Fig. 1). Characterization by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography and the Wunsch assay demonstrated a purity of 92%, 93%, and 89% for Cl-115, Cl-100, and CII, and an amidolytic activity of 0.072, 0.074, and 8.5 4-phenylazobenzyloxycarbonyl-l- prolyl-l-leucylglycyl-prolyl-d-arginine U/ mg, respectively. All fractionated classes were produced from one single batch.FIGURE 1.: Mono-Q high-performance liquid chromatography analysis of the collagenase class I isomers of 100 kDa (class I-100, top) and 115 kDa (class l-115, middle), and collagenase class II (bottom) performed at a wavelength of 280 nm.The blends were supplemented with 1.5 U dimethyl-casein/g of neutral protease and 2.6 U benzoyl-l-arginine-ethyl-ester/g of tryptic-like activity, dissolved in 1.5 mL/g of Hank's balanced salt solution, and intraductally injected into research grade pancreata using a CII activity of 25 U 4-phenylazobenzyloxycarbonyl-l-prolyl-l-leucylglycyl-prolyl-d-arginine/g.islets were isolated as previously described (6). After culture for 2 to 3 days at 37°C, islets were assessed for insulin release during static glucose incubation (2 vs. 20 mM) and for viability (Syto 13/ethidium bromide). Donor age (57.8±4.5 vs. 58.9±3.8), body mass index (23.1±1.2 vs. 24.9±0.4), pancreas weight (60.4±8.6 g vs. 74.1 ±14.1 g), and cold ischemia time (18.4±4.1 hr vs. 14.7±3.3 hr) did not differ between CI-115 (n=8) and CI-100 (n=8) (mean±SE, not significant by Mann-Whitney U test). The proportion of male-to-female donors (3:5 vs. 5:3) and histidine-tryptophan- ketoglutarate to University of Wisconsin solution perfusion (3:5 vs. 2:6) were approximately the same in pancreata processed by means of CI-115 and CI-100 (not significant by Fisher's exact test). No significant differences were observed between CI-115 and CI-100 regarding recirculation time (28.0±2.2 min vs. 24.0±2.3 min), percentage of undigested tissue (8.1±1.1% vs. 12.5±2.0%) and embedded islets (15.0±2.2% vs. 15.3± 5.2%), purity (52.8±4.9% vs. 48.6± 8.9%), and islet yield per gram (2340±320 islet equivalent/g vs. 3010±640 islet equivalent/g) equivalent to a postpurification recovery of 50.7±9.1% and 64.6±7.8%, respectively. Islet morphology and size distribution were similar in both the experimental groups (data not shown). Islet survival (67.1%±7.5% vs. 64.6%±5.9%) and purity (48.5%±4.7% vs. 41.7%± 8.7%) determined postculture were also comparable. Quality assessment indicated no detrimental effect of CI-100 on islet viability (74.7±1.3 vs. 78.1±2.8), insulin content (331±103 μU/ng DNA vs. 255±93 μU/ng DNA), or glucose stimulation index (2.5±0.5 vs. 3.9±0.7) when compared with CI-115. The rapid release of islets from within acinar tissue using effective enzymes is of significant importance to recover islets from the harmful environment present during pancreas digestion to preserve morphologic and metabolic integrity. CI-100 seems to have the same capacity to dissociate human pancreatic tissue and to release islets as CI-115. This is in contrast to previous retrospective analysis (2, 3). Nevertheless, we cannot exclude that a potential deficiency of CI-100 to cleave collagen fibers in the perinsular extracellular matrix is compensated by complementary proteases, such as neutral protease, as demonstrated in rat islet isolation (7). A similar auxiliary function can be discussed for tryptic-like activity identified as clostripain (E.C. 3.4.22.8), which efficiently reduced digestion time in rat and human islet isolation (8). Most importantly, CI-100 was not associated with potential islet-harmful side effects as observed for other low-molecular-weight collagenase isomers that have been regularly removed from final collagenase NB1 preparations (9). This is supported by the observation that in vitro function, viability, or survival postculture was not reduced after CI-100 utilization. In conclusion, the present data indicate that the presence of collagenase CI-100 does not prevent successful islet isolations from the human pancreas. Whether this finding is related to a potential compensatory function of noncollagenolytic proteases has to be clarified in future studies using a model of marginal enzyme activities. Heide Brandhorst1 Sana Asif1 Karin Andersson1 Johanna Mönch2 Olaf Friedrich3 Nicole Rämsch-Günther2 Christian Rämsch3 Melanie Steffens2 Jörg Lambrecht3 Thomas Schräder3 Manfred Kurfürst3 Helene H. Andersson4 Marie Felldin5 Aksel Foss6 Kaija Salmela7 Annika Tibell8 Gunnar Tufveson9 Olle Korsgren1 Daniel Brandhorst1 1 Department of Oncology, Radiology, and Clinical Immunology Uppsala University Uppsala, Sweden 2 Serva Electrophoresis GmbH Uetersen, Germany 3 Nordmark Arzneimittel GmbH & Co. KG Uetersen, Germany 4 Department of Nephrology and Transplantation University Hospital Malmö, Sweden 5 Department of Transplantation University Hospital Gothenburg, Sweden 6 Division of Surgery, Section for Transplantation Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway 7 Division of Transplantation, Surgical Hospital Helsinki University Helsinki, Finland 8 Division of Transplantation Surgery, CLINTEC Karolinska Institute Stockholm, Sweden 9 Department of Surgical Sciences, Division of Transplantation Surgery Uppsala University Hospital Uppsala, Sweden
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".