MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W203939225

Conception, développement et évaluation d’un système en ligne d’aide à la décision pour le choix de produits financiers

2013· article· fr· W203939225 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Matthieu Rodrigue

Notice bibliographique

RevuePolyPublie (École Polytechnique de Montréal) · 2013
Typearticle
Languefr
DomaineBusiness, Management and Accounting
ThématiqueOrganizational Management and Leadership
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésValuation (finance)Investment (military)BusinessFinancial servicesOrder (exchange)TerminologyLigneFinanceActuarial sciencePolitical scienceHumanities
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Small investors are confronted with multiple challenges when it comes to choosing how, with whom and where to invest.The investment process can be time consuming especially for those with basic skills and knowledge on the subject.The specific terminologies related to financial services, the immensity of products and intermediaries, the lack of experience exposing one to possible fraud and the lack of standardized methods are some examples of challenges that an investor might come across during the investment process.The purpose of this research is to develop and test an online experimental decision support system that would both mitigate the risks for small investor by increasing their level of awareness and knowledge and optimizing their decision process by presenting them a clear and complete picture of their investor profile and corresponding financial products.The system supports the investors through a structured investment process leading to a quick overview of the financial products available on the market and their characteristics.The system has a specific mission: to support the investors in their investment process through a structured decision making process that procures information on the terminology of the financial sector and on the different types of products and services corresponding their needs.The system was developed in three phases.During the analysis phase, a literature review was conducted during which we went over the 3 investments guides published by the AMF (Autorit des Marchs Financiers) and the financial policies regulating the financial market in Quebec in order to define a structured investment decision making process and the critical elements to take into account when defining an investor's profile.Documentations published by the CFA Institute (Chartered Financial Analyst Institute) and the MiFID (Markets in Financial Instruments Directive) along with multiple scholarly literatures were consulted to deepen our understanding of the financial domain and to define the parameters of the system.Financial experts were also consulted to help and guide in the development process.Then, 22 similar decision support systems from 19 different creators, both local and international, were analysed in order to benchmark their way of defining investor's profile and the content of their systems.By the end of this phase, the functional and technical requirements of the system were defined allowing the beginning of the next phase.ix During the design phase, we designed the investment selection process used by the system.Then based on our founding, we built the prototype on an Apache server using MySQL to host the database that was programmed in SQL.32 products, 19 mutual funds, 8 bonds and 5 investments with guaranteed and variables return (CPG), from 4 different institutions established in Quebec were integrated in the database.Taking into account the different instance of bond and CPG and mutual funds categories, the amount of products populating the database goes up to 117.PHP was used for the backend programming.CSS, HTML and JavaScript were used to build the forms, the interface and for client side validation purposes.In total, 10 web pages separated in 2 modules, the decision support tool and the support module were created.The system functionalities were then tested and corrections were applied before starting the next phase.During the last development phase, we tested the performance and the reliability of the system.The user's satisfaction was also addressed during the tests.3 experts and 15 final users participated to the tests.The performance tests, which consisted in a comparison of the system's recommendations to those of the experts, revealed that 61% of the recommendation made by the system fit partly or totally those of the experts and that 26.4 % fit totally those of the experts.The reliability test, which consisted in a comparison of the investors/profile pairing functionality of the system to the profile defined by the investor profile definition tool found in the AMF guide, revealed that 80% of the profile defined by the system fit those defined by the AMF tool.Finally, users' satisfaction, collected through surveys, revealed that the system allows them to have a better understanding of the financial world terminology, a better understanding of the elements to take into account during the investment process and a better vision of the financial products available and fitting their profile.The users are unanimous, such system would be useful to guide and inform investors.Experts' comments allowed us to pin point future improvements in both the investment process and the prototype.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,004
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Communication savante, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,812
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0040,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0020,003
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,019
Tête enseignante GPT0,235
Écart entre enseignants0,217 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2013
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePolyPublie (École Polytechnique de Montréal)Même sujetOrganizational Management and LeadershipTravaux en français237 207