The Foundations of Medieval English Ecclesiastical History: Studies presented to David Smith
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This is a distinguished collection of essays. It begins with appreciations by Christopher Brooke and Christopher Webb of David Smith's achievements as scholar and archivist, working in and from the Borthwick Institute at York, and ends with a bibliography of his printed works. Smith is justly renowned for his energy and accuracy in productive and acute research among the sources of the English medieval church, and for his abiding spirit in research of modesty and generosity. His achievements relate especially, as every medievalist is aware, to the editing of episcopal acta (of the Lincoln diocese and as General Editor of the English Episcopal Acta series) and the provision of highly-valued guides and aids—to bishops' registers, to the heads of religious houses, and to the collections of the Borthwick, notably the outstanding records of the York archiepiscopal court. This is the merest sketch of his career-long works of dedication: he has not recoiled from the strenuous demands of major projects. The essays following the appreciations are, in a special way, pièces justificatives. Drawing upon their long association with the English Episcopal Acta series, Julia Barrow, Christopher Harper-Bill and Philippa Hoskin present diagnostic papers, in the nature of progress reports, on three major features of the editing work: the forging of episcopal charters (above all, it appears, by the Benedictine abbeys founded soon after the Conquest and especially in the late twelfth and early thirteenth centuries), the use of acta for the understanding of otherwise relatively unknown bishops' lives (in this case Walter Suffield of Norwich) and the study of episcopal households (the unusual continuity of the familia at Durham). Turning, in the main, to bishops' registers, Nicholas Bennett illustrates, from the deaneries of north-east Lincolnshire in 1290–1340, how fully and closely the attributes of the beneficed clergy can be studied in that period, Donald Logan explores the working of the court of Arches from a register of inhibitions from this court which now forms part of one of Bishop Martival of Salisbury's registers and Alison McHardy provides example upon example of the use of registers for many kinds of political history. From the thirteenth- and fourteenth-century sources of ecclesiastical courts, Janet Burton draws illustrations of the relations of monasteries with the communities outside their cloisters and Richard Helmholz demonstrates striking antecedent characteristics of Tudor charity legislation. Building on established foundations and pointing the way to future work, Brian Kemp, from the level of parish organisation, edits a selection of the earliest known, and relatively rare, acta of rural deans; Jane Sayers, from the level of the Vatican archives, recounts the vagaries and successes of the calendaring, and editing, of papal registers, with the Calendar of Papal Letters (vols. 1–19, 1893–1998) yet to reach the Reformation, and Charles Fonge, from the intermediate levels of an interlacing of patronage, secular and ecclesiastical, opens up the world of collegiate churches—those, that is, that have been overshadowed for too long by the collegiate cathedral churches. It is a mark of the success of this collaborative endeavour that each one of the essays deserves more analytical comment than can be offered here. However much has been achieved, since, for example, the opening of the papal Archivio Segreto in 1883, only now are the firmest of foundations being laid for an appreciation in its many hues of the vibrant world of the late-medieval English church, with its extraordinarily rich and diverse caches of sources.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,005 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,009 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».