Retour aux sources pour une meilleure reconnaissance et valorisation du patrimoine paysager perse
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Historical gardens, being the combined work of nature and humans, are an integral part of our cultural landscapes; they echo the cultural, nature-oriented and identity values and technical expertise of their founders. Research undertaken to preserve the values and expertise of earlier eras may help to safeguard and protect heritage landscapes for present generations, and their transmission to future generations. Today, the preservation of historical gardens, like all historical and heritage sites, is an important component of heritage policies. Despite the steps taken to better understand, manage and maintain historical gardens, insufficient emphasis has been placed on the need to study and preserve historical documents. Such documents provide a wealth of information which, when carefully considered and analysed, could lead to a better understanding and recognition of heritage landscapes, particularly when very little physical evidence remains of their characteristic features and elements. An important aspect of my research, in addition to the focus on the methods and approaches used to identify and understand the spirit of place and the mechanisms that govern heritage landscapes, is the comprehensive study of historical documents. Careful study of such documents may lead to a better understanding of specific sites and their evolution. This, in turn, especially when such sites no longer have a physical reality, may offer guidance and direction to programmes and processes aimed at their preservation and promotion. In this article, the empirical evidence provided by historical documents is used to better identify and understand the characteristic features and elements of the Persian garden of the Qajar period (late nineteenth to early twentieth century). The article focuses primarily on an excerpt from the Tarikh-e Kashan (History of Kashan) dated to the early nineteenth century. The excerpt provides a description of this Qajar garden, referring to it as the Oriental Paradise (Mashreq e-Ferdows); it was located at Borzābād of Kashan, close to the Royal Garden of Fin. It is reasonably possible that no trace of this garden exists today. However, this research, through an intensive review of the historical document, has highlighted some key features and elements of the landscape aspects of the Qajar pleasure gardens of the mid-nineteenth century. Through textual analysis, the main components of the garden were identified; this made it possible to diagram its original plan. This research highlights the dual characteristics of the garden, a mix of contrasting Persian and European aspects, which resulted in its particular composition and gave it a unique and exceptional character. These research findings could be very useful in planning for the conservation and promotion of the gardens of this period, especially those that still exist in the area of Kashan.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle