Management of Hydrocephalus Associated with Vestibular Schwannoma and Other Cerebellopontine Angle Tumors
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
OBJECTIVE: Hydrocephalus (HCP) resulting from cerebellopontine angle (CPA) tumors is not rare. This retrospective study was designed to investigate the incidence of HCP and the clinical presentations, management options, and outcomes of HCP in 284 patients with CPA tumors. METHODS: A retrospective study of 284 consecutive patients with CPA tumors (mostly vestibular schwannomas) treated from 1985 to 1996 at Toronto Western Hospital managed by one surgical team consisting of a neurosurgeon and a neuro-otologist. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients (13.7%) had radiographic and/or clinical evidence of HCP, 37 preoperatively and 2 postoperatively. Tumor type distribution was 33 vestibular schwannomas, 5 meningiomas, and 1 cavernous hemangioma. Only five patients (12%) had obvious obstruction at the fourth ventricular level. In 36 patients (92%), symptoms were mostly chronic and mild, consistent with normal pressure hydrocephalus. Multivariate analysis confirmed the strong association of tumor size and incidence of HCP (P < .0001). Four patients underwent permanent shunting before microsurgical tumor excision, mainly because of florid symptoms of HCP. Microsurgical tumor excision without preoperative shunting was performed in 23 patients, 5 of whom required postoperative shunting in the first 2 months after tumor excision. Eighteen patients (78%) did not need shunts after tumor resection. With regard to tumor size, the postoperatively shunted group did not differ from the patients who had surgery but did not require shunt treatment (P < 0.50). The remaining 10 patients with preoperative HCP received shunts as the only treatment (3 patients), stereotactic radiosurgery (3 patients), or expectant management (4 patients). Two other patients without preoperative HCP developed postoperative HCP and required shunts. Postoperatively, we observed a significant (P < 0.001) increase in the incidence of pseudomeningocele and a nonsignificant (P < 0.1) increase in cerebrospinal fluid leaks (rhinorrhea and/or otorrhea) in patients without shunts as compared with postoperative patients without HCP. The patients were followed after any treatment for a mean of 3.2 years (range, 6 mo-10 yr). Follow-up in the patients who had surgery but did not require a shunt revealed a 61% decrease in clinical symptoms related to HCP and a 75% decrease in radiographic signs of HCP. CONCLUSION: In the presence of HCP, operative resection of CPA tumors can be performed without permanent cerebrospinal fluid shunting. Precautionary measures to decrease the incidence of postoperative complications related to cerebrospinal fluid leak in patients with preoperative HCP include meticulous obliteration of any exposed air cells, including those around the internal auditory canal, accurate restoration of the dural barrier, and temporary lowering of intracranial pressure with a ventricular or lumbar drain. Patients with persistent symptomatic HCP after tumor excision should be treated with a ventriculoperitoneal shunt. Delaying this decision until the postoperative period is safe and avoids unnecessary shunting in the majority of patients.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».