MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Management of Hydrocephalus Associated with Vestibular Schwannoma and Other Cerebellopontine Angle Tumors

2001· article· en· W2041872414 on OpenAlexaffabout
Farhad Pirouzmand, Charles H. Tator, John Rutka

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurosurgery · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMeningioma and schwannoma management
Canadian institutionsToronto Western HospitalUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCerebellopontine angleSurgeryHydrocephalusRadiosurgeryRetrospective cohort studyPseudomeningoceleNeurosurgerySchwannomaShuntingAcoustic neuromaMicrosurgeryHemangiomaRadiologyMagnetic resonance imagingRadiation therapyComplication

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: Hydrocephalus (HCP) resulting from cerebellopontine angle (CPA) tumors is not rare. This retrospective study was designed to investigate the incidence of HCP and the clinical presentations, management options, and outcomes of HCP in 284 patients with CPA tumors. METHODS: A retrospective study of 284 consecutive patients with CPA tumors (mostly vestibular schwannomas) treated from 1985 to 1996 at Toronto Western Hospital managed by one surgical team consisting of a neurosurgeon and a neuro-otologist. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients (13.7%) had radiographic and/or clinical evidence of HCP, 37 preoperatively and 2 postoperatively. Tumor type distribution was 33 vestibular schwannomas, 5 meningiomas, and 1 cavernous hemangioma. Only five patients (12%) had obvious obstruction at the fourth ventricular level. In 36 patients (92%), symptoms were mostly chronic and mild, consistent with normal pressure hydrocephalus. Multivariate analysis confirmed the strong association of tumor size and incidence of HCP (P < .0001). Four patients underwent permanent shunting before microsurgical tumor excision, mainly because of florid symptoms of HCP. Microsurgical tumor excision without preoperative shunting was performed in 23 patients, 5 of whom required postoperative shunting in the first 2 months after tumor excision. Eighteen patients (78%) did not need shunts after tumor resection. With regard to tumor size, the postoperatively shunted group did not differ from the patients who had surgery but did not require shunt treatment (P < 0.50). The remaining 10 patients with preoperative HCP received shunts as the only treatment (3 patients), stereotactic radiosurgery (3 patients), or expectant management (4 patients). Two other patients without preoperative HCP developed postoperative HCP and required shunts. Postoperatively, we observed a significant (P < 0.001) increase in the incidence of pseudomeningocele and a nonsignificant (P < 0.1) increase in cerebrospinal fluid leaks (rhinorrhea and/or otorrhea) in patients without shunts as compared with postoperative patients without HCP. The patients were followed after any treatment for a mean of 3.2 years (range, 6 mo-10 yr). Follow-up in the patients who had surgery but did not require a shunt revealed a 61% decrease in clinical symptoms related to HCP and a 75% decrease in radiographic signs of HCP. CONCLUSION: In the presence of HCP, operative resection of CPA tumors can be performed without permanent cerebrospinal fluid shunting. Precautionary measures to decrease the incidence of postoperative complications related to cerebrospinal fluid leak in patients with preoperative HCP include meticulous obliteration of any exposed air cells, including those around the internal auditory canal, accurate restoration of the dural barrier, and temporary lowering of intracranial pressure with a ventricular or lumbar drain. Patients with persistent symptomatic HCP after tumor excision should be treated with a ventriculoperitoneal shunt. Delaying this decision until the postoperative period is safe and avoids unnecessary shunting in the majority of patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score0.669

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations94
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurosurgerySame topicMeningioma and schwannoma managementFrench-language works237,207