“Intricate Lettings Out and Lettings In”: Listener Scaffolding of Narrative Identity in Newly Dating Romantic Partners
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
AbstractThe development of narrative identity occurs within storytelling contexts, and the present study examined the role of listener behaviors in this process. Methodology developed within studies of mother–child conversations was used to examine how listener behaviors are associated with the meanings that individuals make of their personal stories in conversations with their romantic partners and in subsequent private reflection. Fifty-two "speakers" shared an important personal memory with their partner. These narratives were coded for meaning-making (self-event connections), and listener turns were coded for scaffolding behaviors (positive responding, new interpretations, negations). Overall, a summary composite score of scaffolding behavior was associated with more meaning produced in the conversation and afterwards. Further analyses showed that scaffolding behavior was particularly important to the production of negative meanings, and specific types of scaffolding behaviors also interacted with each other in predicting meaning production. Results are discussed in terms of the role that listeners play in narrative identity development.Keywords:: Narrative identityConversationsAutobiographical memoryRomantic partners AcknowledgementsWe would like to thank the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada and Western Washington University for funding to complete this project. We also thank the narrative lab at the University of Toronto for data collection and transcription, and Stephanie Marion, Jessie Dorn, and Rachel Ashleman for coding.Notes1. The term "scaffolding" was originally applied to this coding scheme, as its purpose was to understand how mothers expertly guide and encourage their children's talk about the past. We acknowledge that our use of scaffolding variables in this study transfers this methodology to a sample where conversation partners are equals and no "expert" exists, making the term "scaffolding" a bit of a misnomer. However, we believe it is useful to continue to use the term "scaffolding" when describing variables derived via the Haden et al. (Citation1997) and Bird and Reese (Citation2006) coding scheme, to facilitate comparisons of how the same listener behaviors function at different points of the lifespan and in different relationship contexts. However, we will use the term "scaffolding behavior" to indicate that we refer to the specific behaviors (i.e., a new interpretation) rather than the combined effort to expertly guide a conversation.2. Demographic information was lost for one couple.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle