Kozhevnikov–Rasmussen Syndrome and the New Proposal on Classification
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
To the Editor: The new Classification Scheme of the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) (1) makes a historical error by adopting a single eponymic nomenclature “Rasmussen syndrome” in replacement of “Kozhevnikov type 2 syndrome” (current English spelling for the name), officially recognized by the ILAE from 1985 as follows (2): Two types of Kozhevnikov's syndrome are now recognized, but only one of these two types is included among the epileptic syndromes of childhood, because the other one is not specifically related to this age. The childhood disorder, suspected to be of viral etiology, has onset between 2 and 10 years (peak, 6 years) with seizures that are motor partial seizures, but are often associated with other types. However, after a symposium in the Montreal Neurological Institute (June 1988) (3), the name Rasmussen syndrome was introduced in the 1989 ILAE classification (4) as a sharing synonym with “Kozhevnikov type 2 syndrome,” not a substitute for this (4): Two types of Kozhenikov's syndrome are recognized, one of which is also known as Rasmussen's syndrome and is included among the epileptic syndromes of childhood noted under symptomatic seizures. Kozhevnikov (5) superbly described a seizure/status “epilepsia corticalis sive partialis continua” (epilepsia partialis continua) that he attributed to a syndrome of “chronic encephalitis”(5): In recent years I happened to observe several cases of cortical epilepsy … that it may be called epilepsia corticalis sive partialis continua, in that here the convulsive manifestations were continuous… The question of the nature of the disease process is much more difficult… in all cases the illness developed little by little and once it had developed persisted for a very long time, so that we can postulate only chronic processes here… Thus, of the chronic processes, encephalitis with transition to secondary hardening of the brain, or sclerosis cerebri, is almost the only possibility… Thus, not knowing precisely what we are dealing with, and proposing the presence of chronic encephalitis. The recent ILAE proposal to eliminate Kozhevnikov from his syndrome of chronic encephalitis is mainly due to a major misconception that Kozhevnikov described Russian spring/summer tick-borne encephalitis. This originates from Andermann (3), who stated, “Epilepsia partialis continua was first described by Kozhevnikov and is still known as Kozhevnikov's epilepsy in francophone countries. Omorokov then showed that it was due to spring/summer encephalitis.” These are erroneous: Kozhevnikov syndrome (type 1 and type 2) was already recognised in the International Classification of the ILAE Commission (2,4). It was well used around the world, including in the American literature, from the beginning of the previous century. For example, in 1924, Wilson and Winkelman (Arch Neurol Psychiatry 1924;11:530–542) of Philadelphia extensively cited Kozhevnikov and described three cases with neuropathologic confirmation of encephalitis. No one ever showed that Kozhevnikov's four patients had tick-borne encephalitis, a disease that was described in 1937, 38 years after his death. Furthermore, only one of his four cases had acute illness: “in all cases the illness developed little by little”(5). The seizure/status “epilepsia partialis continua of Kozhevnikov”(1) (or Kozhevnikov type 1 syndrome) (2,4) is a symptom of many heterogeneous disorders affecting children and adults. What Omorokov (3) found is that many of his cases with epilepsia partialis continua (the seizure) in Siberia (Kozhevnikov was practising in Moscow) had acute encephalitis, and a few had cysticercosis (see translation of the original report by Omorokov) (3). Despite all these, the only reference to Kozhevnikov in the relevant official chapter of the ILAE Task Force (http://www.epilepsy.org) is as follows: “Russian spring-summer tick-borne encephalitis, described by Kozhevnikov (Kozhevnikov, 1991).” Kozhevnikov–Rasmussen syndrome is the only proper nomenclature to honour both these great men who independently described this epileptic syndrome of chronic encephalitis, half a century apart.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,007 | 0,037 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,007 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,009 |
| Science ouverte | 0,005 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,017 | 0,033 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».