MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Kozhevnikov–Rasmussen Syndrome and the New Proposal on Classification

2002· letter· en· W2042297722 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
C. P. Panayiotopoulos

Bibliographic record

VenueEpilepsia · 2002
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEpilepsy research and treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEpilepsia partialis continuaEpilepsyEpilepsy syndromesPediatricsEtiologyMedicineWest SyndromePsychologyDermatologyPsychiatryStatus epilepticus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To the Editor: The new Classification Scheme of the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) (1) makes a historical error by adopting a single eponymic nomenclature “Rasmussen syndrome” in replacement of “Kozhevnikov type 2 syndrome” (current English spelling for the name), officially recognized by the ILAE from 1985 as follows (2): Two types of Kozhevnikov's syndrome are now recognized, but only one of these two types is included among the epileptic syndromes of childhood, because the other one is not specifically related to this age. The childhood disorder, suspected to be of viral etiology, has onset between 2 and 10 years (peak, 6 years) with seizures that are motor partial seizures, but are often associated with other types. However, after a symposium in the Montreal Neurological Institute (June 1988) (3), the name Rasmussen syndrome was introduced in the 1989 ILAE classification (4) as a sharing synonym with “Kozhevnikov type 2 syndrome,” not a substitute for this (4): Two types of Kozhenikov's syndrome are recognized, one of which is also known as Rasmussen's syndrome and is included among the epileptic syndromes of childhood noted under symptomatic seizures. Kozhevnikov (5) superbly described a seizure/status “epilepsia corticalis sive partialis continua” (epilepsia partialis continua) that he attributed to a syndrome of “chronic encephalitis”(5): In recent years I happened to observe several cases of cortical epilepsy … that it may be called epilepsia corticalis sive partialis continua, in that here the convulsive manifestations were continuous… The question of the nature of the disease process is much more difficult… in all cases the illness developed little by little and once it had developed persisted for a very long time, so that we can postulate only chronic processes here… Thus, of the chronic processes, encephalitis with transition to secondary hardening of the brain, or sclerosis cerebri, is almost the only possibility… Thus, not knowing precisely what we are dealing with, and proposing the presence of chronic encephalitis. The recent ILAE proposal to eliminate Kozhevnikov from his syndrome of chronic encephalitis is mainly due to a major misconception that Kozhevnikov described Russian spring/summer tick-borne encephalitis. This originates from Andermann (3), who stated, “Epilepsia partialis continua was first described by Kozhevnikov and is still known as Kozhevnikov's epilepsy in francophone countries. Omorokov then showed that it was due to spring/summer encephalitis.” These are erroneous: Kozhevnikov syndrome (type 1 and type 2) was already recognised in the International Classification of the ILAE Commission (2,4). It was well used around the world, including in the American literature, from the beginning of the previous century. For example, in 1924, Wilson and Winkelman (Arch Neurol Psychiatry 1924;11:530–542) of Philadelphia extensively cited Kozhevnikov and described three cases with neuropathologic confirmation of encephalitis. No one ever showed that Kozhevnikov's four patients had tick-borne encephalitis, a disease that was described in 1937, 38 years after his death. Furthermore, only one of his four cases had acute illness: “in all cases the illness developed little by little”(5). The seizure/status “epilepsia partialis continua of Kozhevnikov”(1) (or Kozhevnikov type 1 syndrome) (2,4) is a symptom of many heterogeneous disorders affecting children and adults. What Omorokov (3) found is that many of his cases with epilepsia partialis continua (the seizure) in Siberia (Kozhevnikov was practising in Moscow) had acute encephalitis, and a few had cysticercosis (see translation of the original report by Omorokov) (3). Despite all these, the only reference to Kozhevnikov in the relevant official chapter of the ILAE Task Force (http://www.epilepsy.org) is as follows: “Russian spring-summer tick-borne encephalitis, described by Kozhevnikov (Kozhevnikov, 1991).” Kozhevnikov–Rasmussen syndrome is the only proper nomenclature to honour both these great men who independently described this epileptic syndrome of chronic encephalitis, half a century apart.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.037
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.037
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.007
Scholarly communication0.0030.009
Open science0.0050.002
Research integrity0.0170.033
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEpilepsiaSame topicEpilepsy research and treatmentFrench-language works237,207