No Holding Back: Operation Totalize, Normandy, August 1944 (review)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: No Holding Back: Operation Totalize, Normandy, August 1944 Frank Kalesnik No Holding Back: Operation Totalize, Normandy, August 1944. By Brian A. Reid. Toronto: Robin Brass Studio, 2005. ISBN 1-896941-40-0. Maps. Photographs. Figures. Appendixes. Notes. Bibiliography. Index. Pp. xix, 491. $37.50. No Holding Back describes the 7 August 1944 attack planned and led by Canadian General Guy Simonds and involving British and Polish as well as Canadian troops. Coinciding with Operation Lüttich, the German counterattack stopped by the U.S. Army at Mortain, and the northward shift of the XV Corps of Patton's Third Army towards Argentan, Operation Totalize set the stage for the creation of the Falaise pocket and the destruction of German forces in Normandy. While both scholars and participants have argued that a more aggressive push by the Canadian II Corps could have sealed the Germans' fate more quickly and completely, author Brian Reid makes a convincing case that Totalize was considered a success at the time and should still be regarded as one today. As a retired Canadian army lieutenant colonel, Reid combines military experience with sound scholarship in his analysis of this aspect of the controversial Normandy campaign. Americans tend to assume they did all the fighting while the British dithered, and the roles of Canadian, Free French, and Polish forces are largely ignored. Actually, Montgomery's plan always assumed that the British would engage the bulk of the German Panzer divisions, pinning them down until the Americans broke out. This role was more than fulfilled in a series of bloody attacks throughout June and July. While Totalize did not succeed in its original objective of capturing Falaise, it did pin down the 12th SS Panzer ("Hitlerjugend") division, which was being relieved by the 89th Infantry division when the attack started. Reid begins his study with a description of the Canadian halt after the first phase of the attack, when the road to Falaise seemed open. Instead of seizing the initiative, Simonds stuck to his plan, throwing away a golden opportunity. The author then asks the crucial question: "What happened? How had an attack that had started with so much promise achieve so little? Or did Totalize actually succeed beyond the norm for major operations by the British and Canadian armies in Normandy?" (p. 5). The author makes the case for success. He does so not only by discussing the planning and execution of the operation, but by looking at the strengths and weaknesses of the Canadian Army and its leaders. He utilizes a variety of documentary and published sources, which he carefully evaluates in both the text and detailed notes. Reid's description of the fighting goes down to the tactical level, and covers the key role of airpower as well as operations on the ground. British and Polish forces get equal treatment with the Canadians—a history of the 1st Polish Armoured Division constitutes one of the excellent appendixes, which also include orders of battle, a review of the tactical problems of the Normandy campaign, and a discussion of events surrounding the death of Michael Wittman, an ace German Tiger tank commander. [End Page 269] Readers will appreciate the numerous maps and diagrams that accompany the text, as well as illustrations of equipment and well chosen photographs. No Holding Back is a useful contribution to the literature of the Normandy campaign and will be of interest to both scholars and enthusiasts. This reviewer looks forward to the publication of the author's book on Operation Tractable, the Canadian II Corps' attack beginning on 14 August that helped close the Falaise Gap. Frank Kalesnik State University of New York–Orange Middletown, New York Copyright © 2006 Society for Military History
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,006 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».