MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2042642845 · doi:10.1353/jmh.2006.0018

No Holding Back: Operation Totalize, Normandy, August 1944 (review)

2006· article· en· W2042642845 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Frank Kalesnik

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Military History · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGermanHistoryCounterattackLawPolitical scienceArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: No Holding Back: Operation Totalize, Normandy, August 1944 Frank Kalesnik No Holding Back: Operation Totalize, Normandy, August 1944. By Brian A. Reid. Toronto: Robin Brass Studio, 2005. ISBN 1-896941-40-0. Maps. Photographs. Figures. Appendixes. Notes. Bibiliography. Index. Pp. xix, 491. $37.50. No Holding Back describes the 7 August 1944 attack planned and led by Canadian General Guy Simonds and involving British and Polish as well as Canadian troops. Coinciding with Operation Lüttich, the German counterattack stopped by the U.S. Army at Mortain, and the northward shift of the XV Corps of Patton's Third Army towards Argentan, Operation Totalize set the stage for the creation of the Falaise pocket and the destruction of German forces in Normandy. While both scholars and participants have argued that a more aggressive push by the Canadian II Corps could have sealed the Germans' fate more quickly and completely, author Brian Reid makes a convincing case that Totalize was considered a success at the time and should still be regarded as one today. As a retired Canadian army lieutenant colonel, Reid combines military experience with sound scholarship in his analysis of this aspect of the controversial Normandy campaign. Americans tend to assume they did all the fighting while the British dithered, and the roles of Canadian, Free French, and Polish forces are largely ignored. Actually, Montgomery's plan always assumed that the British would engage the bulk of the German Panzer divisions, pinning them down until the Americans broke out. This role was more than fulfilled in a series of bloody attacks throughout June and July. While Totalize did not succeed in its original objective of capturing Falaise, it did pin down the 12th SS Panzer ("Hitlerjugend") division, which was being relieved by the 89th Infantry division when the attack started. Reid begins his study with a description of the Canadian halt after the first phase of the attack, when the road to Falaise seemed open. Instead of seizing the initiative, Simonds stuck to his plan, throwing away a golden opportunity. The author then asks the crucial question: "What happened? How had an attack that had started with so much promise achieve so little? Or did Totalize actually succeed beyond the norm for major operations by the British and Canadian armies in Normandy?" (p. 5). The author makes the case for success. He does so not only by discussing the planning and execution of the operation, but by looking at the strengths and weaknesses of the Canadian Army and its leaders. He utilizes a variety of documentary and published sources, which he carefully evaluates in both the text and detailed notes. Reid's description of the fighting goes down to the tactical level, and covers the key role of airpower as well as operations on the ground. British and Polish forces get equal treatment with the Canadians—a history of the 1st Polish Armoured Division constitutes one of the excellent appendixes, which also include orders of battle, a review of the tactical problems of the Normandy campaign, and a discussion of events surrounding the death of Michael Wittman, an ace German Tiger tank commander. [End Page 269] Readers will appreciate the numerous maps and diagrams that accompany the text, as well as illustrations of equipment and well chosen photographs. No Holding Back is a useful contribution to the literature of the Normandy campaign and will be of interest to both scholars and enthusiasts. This reviewer looks forward to the publication of the author's book on Operation Tractable, the Canadian II Corps' attack beginning on 14 August that helped close the Falaise Gap. Frank Kalesnik State University of New York–Orange Middletown, New York Copyright © 2006 Society for Military History

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.979
Threshold uncertainty score0.171

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0510.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Military HistorySame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207