Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Shakespeare’s Falstaff:‘The cause that wit is in other men’ Jill L. Levenson (bio) Towards the end of Henry iv Part 1, Shakespeare's Falstaff conducts himself in ways apparently designed to unsettle an audience's responses. At this point the play has reached a crescendo in the Battle of Shrewsbury, pivotal to the ferocious Hundred Years (civil) War. Falstaff has expressed his view of military honour in the famous catechism which Arrigo Boito and Giuseppe Verdi reprise in their opera, Falstaff: ... but how if honour prick me off when I come on? How then? Can honour set to a leg? No. Or an arm? No. Or take away the grief of a wound? No. Honour hath no skill in surgery, then? No. What is honour? A word. (5.1.130-33) And now, on the battlefield, Falstaff will bump into the Earl of Douglas, a fierce rebel against the king. On another part of the stage Prince Hal engages with his most important adversary, Hotspur, and a stage direction tells a reader what happens next: Enter Douglas. He fighteth with Falstaff, who falls down as if he were dead. The Prince killeth Percy. (5.4.75.1-3) Of course, an audience seeing this play for the first time would not know that Falstaff was pretending, acting out his lack of conviction in the value of honour. When Hal sees Falstaff on the ground, he delivers a short eulogy: 'What, old acquaintance, could not all this flesh / Keep in a little life? Poor Jack, farewell! / I could have better spared a better man' (5.4.101-3). An audience new to the play might appreciate Hal's sentiment; an audience familiar with it would adopt an ironic point of view. In either case, when 'Falstaff riseth up' at Hal's exit, the effect is suddenly comedic, even farcical. But then it takes another turn in the soliloquy which follows, when Falstaff contemplates the dead Hotspur lying beside him: 'I'll make him sure,' he decides, 'yea, and I'll swear I killed him' (5.4.122-23). With that he stabs Hotspur in the thigh and hoists him on his back, as if he were a devil carrying Percy off to hell. The sequence epitomizes what Shakespeareans like to call the 'rich ambivalence' of Falstaff in the English history plays. Within this dramatic context the character seduces audiences and readers because he subverts [End Page 722] social values as he critiques them, creating opportunities for psychological release and festivity. He seduces them also with his strikingly imaginative and original idiom, which infuses the texts with energy. Yet Falstaff's antics can modulate into a disturbing key, as they do at the end of Henry iv Part 1, and before we know it we are the uncomfortable witnesses of a desecration. At the corresponding point in Henry iv Part 2, an even more famous sequence unsettles audience response in a different way: the fourth and fifth scenes of the last act present the rejection of Falstaff by the newly crowned King Henry V. Through invented episodes before the climactic one, the play makes it clear that Falstaff must go if the new king is to govern responsibly. When Falstaff hears that Henry IV is dead, he expects to redesign government to his specifications. 'I know the young King is sick for me,' he tells his old cronies. 'Let us take any man's horses - the laws of England are at my commandment' (5.3.131-34). Immediately we witness a violent scene - a glimpse of Falstaff's world - as Mistress Quickly and Doll Tearsheet are dragged off by beadles for participating in a murder. The coronation follows, Falstaff watching the procession and anticipating a warm welcome from Hal. Instead, he hears a speech of twenty-five lines or so about reforming himself, a speech notable for its coldness and distance: I know thee not, old man. Fall to thy prayers. How ill white hairs becomes a fool and jester! I have long dreamt of such a kind of man, So surfeit-swelled, so old, and so profane; But being awaked, I do despise my dream. (5.5.46-50...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,018 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».