MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2042898630 · doi:10.1353/rah.2011.0109

The Original Cold Warrior, Democratic Party

2011· article· en· W2042898630 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Richard M. Filipink

Notice bibliographique

RevueReviews in American History · 2011
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueMilitary and Defense Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésDemocracyEliteBiographyNarrativeLawHistorySociologyPolitical sciencePoliticsArtLiterature

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The Original Cold Warrior, Democratic Party Richard M. Filipink (bio) Robert J. McMahon . Dean Acheson and the Creation of an American World Order. Washington, D.C.: Potomac Books, 2009. xii + 257 pp. Photos, notes, bibliographic essay, and index. $16.95. Robert McMahon's opening volume in Potomac Books' Shapers of International History series is an interesting narrative biography of Dean Acheson. In a tightly written work, McMahon argues that Acheson was the primary architect of America's Cold War foreign policy. Acheson was able to take on that role, the book contends, due to his life experiences, his innate self-confidence, and the lessons learned from the men he considered his mentors. Thus, understanding Acheson the man is fundamental to understanding Acheson the statesman. McMahon's first chapter covers Acheson's life from birth in 1893 to his return to the State Department in February 1941. McMahon argues that although Acheson did not come from "an archetypical Eastern Establishment, ruling elite family," his youth and schooling put him on a similar path (p. 5). The son of an Episcopalian minister who had recently emigrated from Canada, Dean Acheson grew up in a middle-class home in Connecticut before shipping off to boarding school at age nine. Acheson considered his childhood idyllic, a lost paradise that formed his foundation as a person. As McMahon describes it, Acheson's attitude toward his childhood was part of his "lifelong tendency to place himself, his experiences, and the outlook of his social class at the very epicenter of the world" (p. 7). This tendency shaped Acheson's beliefs both about his own role, as well as his conviction for the role the United States should play in the world. Acheson was an indifferent student at Groton and Yale, concerned more about enjoying himself than about studies. Upon entering Harvard Law School in 1915, Acheson finally began to take education and life more seriously. One of the key factors in this change, according to McMahon, was the first of Acheson's mentors: Felix Frankfurter. Frankfurter was a professor at Harvard Law who took Acheson under his wing and both encouraged his abilities and facilitated his career. Frankfurter's recommendation was key to Acheson's clerking with Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis. While working for Brandeis, Acheson met his second mentor, Justice Oliver Wendell [End Page 523] Holmes Jr., whom Acheson later described as his personal hero. From these three men, two of whom (Frankfurter and Holmes) became personal friends, Acheson developed the self-confidence and the belief system that guided his future career. From Holmes he learned the importance of factual precision and pragmatism; from Frankfurter the importance of allowing evidence to shape conclusions. McMahon persuasively argues throughout the later chapters that these qualities shaped Acheson's actions throughout his career in Washington. It was a career that almost died prematurely after Acheson's stint at the Treasury Department in 1933. His legal convictions led to a clash with Franklin Roosevelt over the president's gold-purchase plan, which led to Acheson's resignation after six months. But those six months in public service addicted Acheson to participation in the government. Although he would spend the next nine years as a successful lawyer, Acheson never again enjoyed the law as much as "the flypaper of government service" (p. 17). He rebuilt bridges with President Roosevelt by coauthoring, with Benjamin Cohen, a legal brief that justified Roosevelt's decision to transfer fifty destroyers to the British in return for lease rights to bases in the Western Hemisphere. By using the law to justify rather than hamper presidential action, Acheson regained Roosevelt's good graces, leading to his appointment as assistant secretary of state for economic affairs in February 1941. Chapter two discusses Acheson's career as assistant and then undersecretary of state from 1941 to 1947. Despite serving much of this time under secretaries who were not as effective or as distinguished as Acheson would have liked (Cordell Hull, Edward Stettinius, and James Byrnes), Acheson began to play an increasingly important role in developing policy. As assistant secretary for economic affairs, he was responsible for interpreting "FDR's loosely defined oil embargo directive of July 1941...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,051
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,169

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0060,003
Communication savante0,0070,003
Science ouverte0,0000,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0510,016

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,080
Tête enseignante GPT0,311
Écart entre enseignants0,231 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2011
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueReviews in American HistoryMême sujetMilitary and Defense StudiesTravaux en français237 207