MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2042898630 · doi:10.1353/rah.2011.0109

The Original Cold Warrior, Democratic Party

2011· article· en· W2042898630 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Richard M. Filipink

Bibliographic record

VenueReviews in American History · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMilitary and Defense Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDemocracyEliteBiographyNarrativeLawHistorySociologyPolitical sciencePoliticsArtLiterature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Original Cold Warrior, Democratic Party Richard M. Filipink (bio) Robert J. McMahon . Dean Acheson and the Creation of an American World Order. Washington, D.C.: Potomac Books, 2009. xii + 257 pp. Photos, notes, bibliographic essay, and index. $16.95. Robert McMahon's opening volume in Potomac Books' Shapers of International History series is an interesting narrative biography of Dean Acheson. In a tightly written work, McMahon argues that Acheson was the primary architect of America's Cold War foreign policy. Acheson was able to take on that role, the book contends, due to his life experiences, his innate self-confidence, and the lessons learned from the men he considered his mentors. Thus, understanding Acheson the man is fundamental to understanding Acheson the statesman. McMahon's first chapter covers Acheson's life from birth in 1893 to his return to the State Department in February 1941. McMahon argues that although Acheson did not come from "an archetypical Eastern Establishment, ruling elite family," his youth and schooling put him on a similar path (p. 5). The son of an Episcopalian minister who had recently emigrated from Canada, Dean Acheson grew up in a middle-class home in Connecticut before shipping off to boarding school at age nine. Acheson considered his childhood idyllic, a lost paradise that formed his foundation as a person. As McMahon describes it, Acheson's attitude toward his childhood was part of his "lifelong tendency to place himself, his experiences, and the outlook of his social class at the very epicenter of the world" (p. 7). This tendency shaped Acheson's beliefs both about his own role, as well as his conviction for the role the United States should play in the world. Acheson was an indifferent student at Groton and Yale, concerned more about enjoying himself than about studies. Upon entering Harvard Law School in 1915, Acheson finally began to take education and life more seriously. One of the key factors in this change, according to McMahon, was the first of Acheson's mentors: Felix Frankfurter. Frankfurter was a professor at Harvard Law who took Acheson under his wing and both encouraged his abilities and facilitated his career. Frankfurter's recommendation was key to Acheson's clerking with Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis. While working for Brandeis, Acheson met his second mentor, Justice Oliver Wendell [End Page 523] Holmes Jr., whom Acheson later described as his personal hero. From these three men, two of whom (Frankfurter and Holmes) became personal friends, Acheson developed the self-confidence and the belief system that guided his future career. From Holmes he learned the importance of factual precision and pragmatism; from Frankfurter the importance of allowing evidence to shape conclusions. McMahon persuasively argues throughout the later chapters that these qualities shaped Acheson's actions throughout his career in Washington. It was a career that almost died prematurely after Acheson's stint at the Treasury Department in 1933. His legal convictions led to a clash with Franklin Roosevelt over the president's gold-purchase plan, which led to Acheson's resignation after six months. But those six months in public service addicted Acheson to participation in the government. Although he would spend the next nine years as a successful lawyer, Acheson never again enjoyed the law as much as "the flypaper of government service" (p. 17). He rebuilt bridges with President Roosevelt by coauthoring, with Benjamin Cohen, a legal brief that justified Roosevelt's decision to transfer fifty destroyers to the British in return for lease rights to bases in the Western Hemisphere. By using the law to justify rather than hamper presidential action, Acheson regained Roosevelt's good graces, leading to his appointment as assistant secretary of state for economic affairs in February 1941. Chapter two discusses Acheson's career as assistant and then undersecretary of state from 1941 to 1947. Despite serving much of this time under secretaries who were not as effective or as distinguished as Acheson would have liked (Cordell Hull, Edward Stettinius, and James Byrnes), Acheson began to play an increasingly important role in developing policy. As assistant secretary for economic affairs, he was responsible for interpreting "FDR's loosely defined oil embargo directive of July 1941...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.605
Threshold uncertainty score0.681

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReviews in American HistorySame topicMilitary and Defense StudiesFrench-language works237,207