MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2044607223 · doi:10.1353/utq.2012.0029

Taking Back Our Spirits: Indigenous Literature, Public Policy, and Healing (review)

2012· article· en· W2044607223 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Cheryl Suzack

Notice bibliographique

RevueUniversity of Toronto Quarterly · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueEcocriticism and Environmental Literature
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésIndigenousColonialismDialecticSociologyEconomic JusticeState (computer science)Political scienceMedia studiesHistoryGender studiesLaw

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Taking Back Our Spirits: Indigenous Literature, Public Policy, and Healing Cheryl Suzack (bio) Jo-Ann Episkenew. Taking Back Our Spirits: Indigenous Literature, Public Policy, and Healing. University of Manitoba Press. 2009. vii, 247. $27.95 Jo-Ann Episkenew’s much-anticipated book, Taking Back Our Spirits: Indigenous Literature, Public Policy, and Healing, analyzes the capacities of Indigenous literatures to “de-educate” both settler-colonial and Indigenous communities from the trappings of colonialism. Written by a respected community educator, social activist, and literary scholar who has played a foundational role in transforming the public’s awareness of Indigenous issues in their one-sided characterization by the nation-state, Episkenew’s work examines a dialectical tension in contemporary Indigenous debates in order to address the following questions: How have Indigenous stories addressed the trauma of colonial policies, and how have Indigenous artists chartered a path toward community healing and renewal in response to these imposed colonial practices? Episkenew asserts that healing is at the centre of the individual and collective stories that Indigenous artists tell about their experiences of colonialism and that these stories have the power to heal communities from the trauma of settler occupation. Their writing not only illustrates how colonial policies caused a breach in family and community relationships but also envisions counter-discursive reading strategies that call attention to writing as an ‘implement[] of social justice’ and as a ‘tool of anti-racist education.’ Works by Basil Johnston, Maria Campbell, Beatrice Culleton Mosionier, and Richard Wagamese are explored for their engagement with the systemic implications of cultural genocide through land dispossession and residential school experiences, in juxtaposition with plays by Daniel David Moses and Ian Ross that show the continuum of colonial trauma across historical and literary forms. Written in an engaging style that foregrounds the complexities of ‘implicating Indigenous readers/audiences’ while also ‘giving voice and validation’ to Indigenous peoples’ collective experience, Taking Back Our Spirits practices the dialectic of decolonization that it sets out to test. Each chapter underscores the capacity of the artist’s Indigenous voice and vision to redirect the reader’s awareness from the collective myth of benign nation-building that justifies settler-colonial status and occupation to the devastating individual, family, and community consequences that follow from unavoidable policies of re-education and removal that altered spiritual and ancestral relationships. One of the many achievements of Episkenew’s study is its attention to documenting the connection between suffering ‘grievous emotional wounds’ and [End Page 718] the impact of these wounds for the wider health of Indigenous peoples’ community and spirit. Episkenew validates these experiences without requiring more of readers than a demeanor of ‘empathy’ and ‘understanding’ in the pursuit of de-education as a model of social change. In this regard, the book is both compelling for its subtlety in framing the ongoing political and social vulnerability that confronts Indigenous communities as a form of consciousness-raising and curtailed in refusing to underscore more than the literature’s socio-pedagogical function. Episkenew’s message is thus one of political oscillation guided, on the one hand, by expressions of hope and confidence that literature will direct the capacity within communities ‘to take back our spirits’ and, on the other, by uneasiness and gravity should that direction go forward without the involvement of Indigenous epistemologies and practices that were so effectively eradicated by colonial actors and policy makers. Given the enormity of the colonial impacts that Episkenew explores, her position argues ethically for the project of literary decolonization and social justice for Indigenous peoples as a future objective still to be written. Cheryl Suzack Department of English, University of Toronto Copyright © 2012 University of Toronto Press Incorporated

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,932
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,018
Tête enseignante GPT0,215
Écart entre enseignants0,198 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2012
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUniversity of Toronto QuarterlyMême sujetEcocriticism and Environmental LiteratureTravaux en français237 207