MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2044607223 · doi:10.1353/utq.2012.0029

Taking Back Our Spirits: Indigenous Literature, Public Policy, and Healing (review)

2012· article· en· W2044607223 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Cheryl Suzack

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Toronto Quarterly · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicEcocriticism and Environmental Literature
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousColonialismDialecticSociologyEconomic JusticeState (computer science)Political scienceMedia studiesHistoryGender studiesLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Taking Back Our Spirits: Indigenous Literature, Public Policy, and Healing Cheryl Suzack (bio) Jo-Ann Episkenew. Taking Back Our Spirits: Indigenous Literature, Public Policy, and Healing. University of Manitoba Press. 2009. vii, 247. $27.95 Jo-Ann Episkenew’s much-anticipated book, Taking Back Our Spirits: Indigenous Literature, Public Policy, and Healing, analyzes the capacities of Indigenous literatures to “de-educate” both settler-colonial and Indigenous communities from the trappings of colonialism. Written by a respected community educator, social activist, and literary scholar who has played a foundational role in transforming the public’s awareness of Indigenous issues in their one-sided characterization by the nation-state, Episkenew’s work examines a dialectical tension in contemporary Indigenous debates in order to address the following questions: How have Indigenous stories addressed the trauma of colonial policies, and how have Indigenous artists chartered a path toward community healing and renewal in response to these imposed colonial practices? Episkenew asserts that healing is at the centre of the individual and collective stories that Indigenous artists tell about their experiences of colonialism and that these stories have the power to heal communities from the trauma of settler occupation. Their writing not only illustrates how colonial policies caused a breach in family and community relationships but also envisions counter-discursive reading strategies that call attention to writing as an ‘implement[] of social justice’ and as a ‘tool of anti-racist education.’ Works by Basil Johnston, Maria Campbell, Beatrice Culleton Mosionier, and Richard Wagamese are explored for their engagement with the systemic implications of cultural genocide through land dispossession and residential school experiences, in juxtaposition with plays by Daniel David Moses and Ian Ross that show the continuum of colonial trauma across historical and literary forms. Written in an engaging style that foregrounds the complexities of ‘implicating Indigenous readers/audiences’ while also ‘giving voice and validation’ to Indigenous peoples’ collective experience, Taking Back Our Spirits practices the dialectic of decolonization that it sets out to test. Each chapter underscores the capacity of the artist’s Indigenous voice and vision to redirect the reader’s awareness from the collective myth of benign nation-building that justifies settler-colonial status and occupation to the devastating individual, family, and community consequences that follow from unavoidable policies of re-education and removal that altered spiritual and ancestral relationships. One of the many achievements of Episkenew’s study is its attention to documenting the connection between suffering ‘grievous emotional wounds’ and [End Page 718] the impact of these wounds for the wider health of Indigenous peoples’ community and spirit. Episkenew validates these experiences without requiring more of readers than a demeanor of ‘empathy’ and ‘understanding’ in the pursuit of de-education as a model of social change. In this regard, the book is both compelling for its subtlety in framing the ongoing political and social vulnerability that confronts Indigenous communities as a form of consciousness-raising and curtailed in refusing to underscore more than the literature’s socio-pedagogical function. Episkenew’s message is thus one of political oscillation guided, on the one hand, by expressions of hope and confidence that literature will direct the capacity within communities ‘to take back our spirits’ and, on the other, by uneasiness and gravity should that direction go forward without the involvement of Indigenous epistemologies and practices that were so effectively eradicated by colonial actors and policy makers. Given the enormity of the colonial impacts that Episkenew explores, her position argues ethically for the project of literary decolonization and social justice for Indigenous peoples as a future objective still to be written. Cheryl Suzack Department of English, University of Toronto Copyright © 2012 University of Toronto Press Incorporated

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.036

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0070.013
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.005
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Toronto QuarterlySame topicEcocriticism and Environmental LiteratureFrench-language works237,207