MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2044701420 · doi:10.1353/vcr.2009.0057

The Mass Image: A Social History of Photomechanical Reproduction in Victorian London , and: The Haunted Gallery: Painting, Photography, Film c. 1900 (review)

2009· article· en· W2044701420 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Dennis Denisoff

Notice bibliographique

RevueVictorian review · 2009
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiquePhotography and Visual Culture
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésArtPaintingPhotographyVisual artsArt historyComicsLiterature

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: The Mass Image: A Social History of Photomechanical Reproduction in Victorian London, and: The Haunted Gallery: Painting, Photography, Film c. 1900 Dennis Denisoff (bio) The Mass Image: A Social History of Photomechanical Reproduction in Victorian London by Gerry Beegan; pp. 302. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan, 2008. $101.00 The Haunted Gallery: Painting, Photography, Film c. 1900 by Lynda Nead; pp. 291. New Haven: Yale UP, 2007. $47.50 Neither Gerry Beegan's Mass Image nor Lynda Nead's Haunted Gallery puts Ally Sloper under the microscope, but their latest scholarship has convinced me that he is the quintessential embodiment of Victorian society's developments in visual technology, media, and culture. As many Victorianists know, Ally became the first popular hero of the comic strip, the star of the first British cartoon, Ally Sloper's Half Holiday, and possibly the first cartoon character in film, with record of him appearing in an 1898 production. His image was found not only in periodicals but also in street and stage performances and on a range of objects, including tie pins, door stops, and relish bottles. The "incorrigible, drunken cockney antihero" (Beegan 44) was even more invested in visual culture than this, for without the developments Beegan and Nead explore, he would probably not have been created, let alone become such a prominent figure of the era. As it is, thanks to new visual technologies and media projecting his presence into the mainstream, some Victorians even assumed Ally was an actual person. This perceptual slippage regarding the real, the simulated, and the represented proves central not only to Ally as an embodiment of late-Victorian visuality but also to Beegan's and Nead's most innovative claims regarding visual technology and urban society's changing self-perceptions. Beegan's The Mass Image builds on the scholarship of Jennifer Green-Lewis and Benedict Anderson to argue that a new Victorian public arose from the mass consumption and comprehension of information made possible by the industrialization and mechanization of visual reproduction. Considering the photomechanically illustrated magazine (as opposed to the book or newspaper), Beegan asks himself: "What does it mean ... when tens of thousands, or hundreds of thousands of people could see the same image at the same time, particularly when this image was combined with text? What modes of reading and what types of public were made possible by the new illustrated periodicals?" (2). What was distinctly modern about this community, Beegan argues, is precisely the fact that it formed through the collective consumption of mass-published visual and verbal materials, and The Mass Image explores the role of photomechanical reproduction in fostering this sense of cohesion among individuals spread out across a vast, national space. Beegan's highly knowledgeable discussion of nineteenth-century graphic arts, design, and reproduction technology frequently proves crucial to the insights arising from this informative study. [End Page 253] The study's first and second chapters establish a theoretical framework for Beegan's notion of late-Victorian society as distinctly modern, with particular consideration of the diverse periodicals that helped members of the middle class imagine and fashion themselves as part of a "fluid, exciting, and unsettling visual environment" (26). With the third chapter, the book shifts to the subject of photomechanically illustrated magazines—an area of knowledge in which Beegan excels. The chapter focuses specifically on wood engraving, a fundamental form of visual illustration in the periodical industry during the mid-Victorian period. In this chapter and the next, Beegan narrates the industry's transition of the practice from what was a notably creative process to what was far more an assembly-line endeavour that took into account the capabilities of photographic technology. John Ruskin, of course, challenged these developments, but, as Beegan notes, with artists such as John Everett Millais and Frederick Sandys producing images for magazines, others recognized this period as a golden age for illustration. Especially enlightening in chapters 3 and 4 are Beegan's explanations of technical innovations that saw past processes broken up, while photomechanical innovations allowed other tasks to be fused together. Beegan also explores readers' growing desires for engraved reproductions to echo photographs, leading to the fusion of "the apparent actuality...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,443
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,696

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,017
Tête enseignante GPT0,253
Écart entre enseignants0,236 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2009
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueVictorian reviewMême sujetPhotography and Visual CultureTravaux en français237 207