MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2045994372 · doi:10.1176/pn.40.24.0014

When Should Dementia Patients Be Ordered to Park the Car?

2005· article· en· W2045994372 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Joan Arehart-Treichel

Notice bibliographique

RevuePsychiatric News · 2005
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiqueOlder Adults Driving Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésDementiaGerontologyPopulationBaby boomPsychologyMedicineDiseaseEnvironmental health

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Back to table of contents Previous article Next article Legal NewsFull AccessWhen Should Dementia Patients Be Ordered to Park the Car?Joan Arehart-TreichelJoan Arehart-TreichelPublished Online:16 Dec 2005https://doi.org/10.1176/pn.40.24.0014For a good decade now, John Morris, M.D., a professor of neurology at Washington University in St. Louis, has been interested in the impact of Alzheimer's disease on a person's ability to drive.This issue is becoming increasingly important, Morris reported at the annual Canadian Psychiatric Association meeting in Vancouver in November, since the baby-boom population is growing older, and by 2020 there is going to be a huge number of people 65 years or older driving. And the older people get, the more susceptible they become to Alzheimer's or other forms of dementia.Indeed, simply growing older in itself can be a risk factor for motor vehicle accidents, Morris noted. In one study he and his colleagues conducted, they found that some cognitively healthy older adults became unsafe drivers over a period of two years. But older adults with Alzheimer's declined even more in their driving over this time span, the study showed. The smallest decline in driving occurred in the older, cognitively healthy control subjects, the second-smallest decline in those with very mild Alzheimer's, and the greatest decline in those with mild Alzheimer's.Of course, 16- to 24-year-olds are the most dangerous drivers on the road, Morris said. "But many people with dementia continue to be drivers, and all of them will become unsafe at some point."Common unsafe behaviors in which such individuals engage, he continued, include inability to maintain the vehicle within the lane, failure to signal directional changes or lane shifts, and improper speed control.Nonetheless, he pointed out, simply having a diagnosis of dementia does not necessarily mean that a person is an unsafe driver. So the question is, When should older people with dementia be told that they can no longer drive? Physicians caring for such individuals, he asserted, need to get involved.One possible means of determining whether dementia patients should no longer drive is cognitive evaluation, Morris said. Putting them in a driving simulator is better, but unfortunately it is only a research tool at this point. Still another option is having an occupational therapist give the patient a driving test. Yet such a test is expensive and not widely available.Another option is to talk not only with dementia patients, but with a family member who knows them well and how well they are driving in order to determine whether they should continue driving. "Physician judgment turns out to be pretty good," Morris said.Another motivation for physicians' becoming involved in the question of whether dementia patients should stop driving, Morris pointed out, is that adult children of patients with dementia are often reluctant to make the decision themselves."It is a very sensitive issue," he said. Driving is the way that Americans and Canadians generally get about, and if older people can not go out, they often get depressed. ▪ ISSUES NewArchived

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,253
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,063
Tête enseignante GPT0,390
Écart entre enseignants0,327 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2005
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePsychiatric NewsMême sujetOlder Adults Driving StudiesTravaux en français237 207