MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2045994372 · doi:10.1176/pn.40.24.0014

When Should Dementia Patients Be Ordered to Park the Car?

2005· article· en· W2045994372 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Joan Arehart-Treichel

Bibliographic record

VenuePsychiatric News · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicOlder Adults Driving Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDementiaGerontologyPopulationBaby boomPsychologyMedicineDiseaseEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Back to table of contents Previous article Next article Legal NewsFull AccessWhen Should Dementia Patients Be Ordered to Park the Car?Joan Arehart-TreichelJoan Arehart-TreichelPublished Online:16 Dec 2005https://doi.org/10.1176/pn.40.24.0014For a good decade now, John Morris, M.D., a professor of neurology at Washington University in St. Louis, has been interested in the impact of Alzheimer's disease on a person's ability to drive.This issue is becoming increasingly important, Morris reported at the annual Canadian Psychiatric Association meeting in Vancouver in November, since the baby-boom population is growing older, and by 2020 there is going to be a huge number of people 65 years or older driving. And the older people get, the more susceptible they become to Alzheimer's or other forms of dementia.Indeed, simply growing older in itself can be a risk factor for motor vehicle accidents, Morris noted. In one study he and his colleagues conducted, they found that some cognitively healthy older adults became unsafe drivers over a period of two years. But older adults with Alzheimer's declined even more in their driving over this time span, the study showed. The smallest decline in driving occurred in the older, cognitively healthy control subjects, the second-smallest decline in those with very mild Alzheimer's, and the greatest decline in those with mild Alzheimer's.Of course, 16- to 24-year-olds are the most dangerous drivers on the road, Morris said. "But many people with dementia continue to be drivers, and all of them will become unsafe at some point."Common unsafe behaviors in which such individuals engage, he continued, include inability to maintain the vehicle within the lane, failure to signal directional changes or lane shifts, and improper speed control.Nonetheless, he pointed out, simply having a diagnosis of dementia does not necessarily mean that a person is an unsafe driver. So the question is, When should older people with dementia be told that they can no longer drive? Physicians caring for such individuals, he asserted, need to get involved.One possible means of determining whether dementia patients should no longer drive is cognitive evaluation, Morris said. Putting them in a driving simulator is better, but unfortunately it is only a research tool at this point. Still another option is having an occupational therapist give the patient a driving test. Yet such a test is expensive and not widely available.Another option is to talk not only with dementia patients, but with a family member who knows them well and how well they are driving in order to determine whether they should continue driving. "Physician judgment turns out to be pretty good," Morris said.Another motivation for physicians' becoming involved in the question of whether dementia patients should stop driving, Morris pointed out, is that adult children of patients with dementia are often reluctant to make the decision themselves."It is a very sensitive issue," he said. Driving is the way that Americans and Canadians generally get about, and if older people can not go out, they often get depressed. ▪ ISSUES NewArchived

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.512
Threshold uncertainty score0.696

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0050.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.5120.280

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.390
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePsychiatric NewsSame topicOlder Adults Driving StudiesFrench-language works237,207