Growth and Curve Stabilization in Girls With Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study of a cohort of 132 girls with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the changes in height and scoliosis angle over time by the use of a mathematical model and determine a relationship between height and angle values in patients with AIS. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The influence of growth on idiopathic scoliosis (IS) is still not fully understood. Although it has not been completely demonstrated, it is accepted that a relationship exists between height growth and curve progression, as well as that curve stabilization occurs when growth ends, but it has not yet been demonstrated whether both occur at the same time. METHOD: One hundred thirty-two girls were included in a retrospective study. Inclusion criteria were: adolescent IS, Cobb angle > or =10 degrees , menarche age well documented, and follow-up of at least 2 years in 6-month controls. Main variables were: menarche age, height, Cobb angle, and treatment. Height and angle changes over the time were adjusted by several curvilinear regression models. Calculations were made of the gradient between each consecutive time point (first derivative function). Growth was considered as tending to stabilize when the function gradient changed its sign or was negligible. Height and Cobb angle correlation coefficients for repeated measures were estimated within patients for curves managed with observation and curves managed with a brace. Comparisons among these correlations were based on the Fisher-Z transformation. RESULTS: Height function gradient changed sign at 1 year postmenarche, and Cobb angle function gradient was negligible around menarche. There was a correlation between mean heights and mean angles, being higher for girls managed only with observation. When comparing mean heights in one semester with the mean heights of the previous one, there were statistically significant differences until 2.5 years postmenarche, although after the first year, these differences were clinically irrelevant. A significant increase for angle values was observed in the same period for the group of girls managed with observation and in the 6 months before menarche for the girls managed with a brace. CONCLUSIONS: A mathematical model was used to demonstrate when height and angle growths tend to stabilize (1 year after menarche for height values and at the time of menarche for angle values) in AIS. In the absence of a brace effect, a significant correlation between both growth rates was noted up until 2.5 years after menarche.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».