Growth and Curve Stabilization in Girls With Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study of a cohort of 132 girls with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the changes in height and scoliosis angle over time by the use of a mathematical model and determine a relationship between height and angle values in patients with AIS. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The influence of growth on idiopathic scoliosis (IS) is still not fully understood. Although it has not been completely demonstrated, it is accepted that a relationship exists between height growth and curve progression, as well as that curve stabilization occurs when growth ends, but it has not yet been demonstrated whether both occur at the same time. METHOD: One hundred thirty-two girls were included in a retrospective study. Inclusion criteria were: adolescent IS, Cobb angle > or =10 degrees , menarche age well documented, and follow-up of at least 2 years in 6-month controls. Main variables were: menarche age, height, Cobb angle, and treatment. Height and angle changes over the time were adjusted by several curvilinear regression models. Calculations were made of the gradient between each consecutive time point (first derivative function). Growth was considered as tending to stabilize when the function gradient changed its sign or was negligible. Height and Cobb angle correlation coefficients for repeated measures were estimated within patients for curves managed with observation and curves managed with a brace. Comparisons among these correlations were based on the Fisher-Z transformation. RESULTS: Height function gradient changed sign at 1 year postmenarche, and Cobb angle function gradient was negligible around menarche. There was a correlation between mean heights and mean angles, being higher for girls managed only with observation. When comparing mean heights in one semester with the mean heights of the previous one, there were statistically significant differences until 2.5 years postmenarche, although after the first year, these differences were clinically irrelevant. A significant increase for angle values was observed in the same period for the group of girls managed with observation and in the 6 months before menarche for the girls managed with a brace. CONCLUSIONS: A mathematical model was used to demonstrate when height and angle growths tend to stabilize (1 year after menarche for height values and at the time of menarche for angle values) in AIS. In the absence of a brace effect, a significant correlation between both growth rates was noted up until 2.5 years after menarche.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".