MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2047200464 · doi:10.1353/ecf.0.0086

Yorick’s Congregation: The Church of England in the Time of Laurence Sterne (review)

2009· article· en· W2047200464 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Simon During

Notice bibliographique

RevueEighteenth-Century Fiction · 2009
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueMedieval Literature and History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésScholarshipArgument (complex analysis)ReinterpretationAppealInterpretation (philosophy)Performance artPhilosophyArtClassicsArt historyLawPolitical scienceAesthetics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Yorick’s Congregation: The Church of England in the Time of Laurence Sterne Simon During (bio) Martha E. Bowden. Yorick’s Congregation: The Church of England in the Time of Laurence Sterne. Newark: University of Delaware Press, 2007. 291pp. US$57.50. ISBN 978-0-87413-955-6. This book belongs to a mode of scholarship that was once much more common than it is today, for better or worse. Written from a position of Anglican devotion, it aims to provide Laurence Sterne’s readers with a general, if miscellaneous, understanding of eighteenth-century Anglicanism. That understanding is indeed, as Martha Bowden makes clear, more relevant to Sterne’s fiction than is apparent from much secular scholarship. This, then, is more a work of loving contextualization than of argument or reinterpretation, which is not to say that it fails to make any gestures towards interpretation that fall under two not especially compatible heads. On the one hand, it calls upon Jonathan Lamb’s “double principle” to defend Sterne as a man involved in a dangerous balancing act between his orthodox and heterodox impulses; and it cites the interest and danger of that performance as key to his appeal. In making this move, Bowden also argues that Sterne, as person and as writer, was “genuinely” sentimental and that incidents such as the Maria incident in A Sentimental Journey are (against Thomas Keymer) not to be read as parody. For my own money, a better understanding of Sterne’s sentimentalism is that it exists in an indeterminate space between sincerity and parody, one that is ultimately independent of authorial intention and is probably constitutive of the eighteenth-century culture of sensibility more generally. On the other hand, Bowden suggests that Tristram Shandy presents a “Shandean Liturgy,” with the implication that the text’s formal innovations, along with its description of the Shandy family, belong to the culture of eighteenth-century Anglican practice and ritualism. This is an arresting and original insight, although further efforts of theorization and exposition than those available here are required to see how far it can take us into Sterne’s writing. The book also aims to take advantage of recent developments in eighteenth-century Anglican historiography, namely the new consensus that the Church of England had more vitality and impact in the period than older Whiggish histories conceded. And largely on the basis of that scholarship (as well as Melvyn New’s prodigious research in his edition of Sterne’s sermons), Yorick’s Congregation [End Page 645] offers chapters on Sterne’s parish duties; the publication of his sermons; the relationship between the Church and medicine in reference to Tristram Shandy’s midwife episode; the Sterne family’s cross-generational connection to the Church (Sterne’s grandfather was a famous, hardline Tory archbishop, his uncle a zealous Whig archdeacon); English anti-Catholicism in the period; and Sterne’s descriptions of liturgy. Of the many puzzles that Sterne’s life and work present, few are more intriguing than the relationships among 1) his professional position as a rural Anglican parson; 2) his innovative, subversive, and louche texts; and 3) his embrace of metropolitan/cosmopolitan market culture and celebrity on the back of his success as an author. Put most simply, how can we make sense of the fact that the author of Tristram Shandy was an Anglican priest? Bowden’s book gives some of the information useful to help us to figure this out; but, in part because it is just too inside Anglicanism and too immersed in detail, it does not begin the task itself in any sustained way. In particular, it does not address the theopolitical structures and transformations that are so important to understanding both the Church and the literary field in the long eighteenth century. Indeed, it treats the period as a single, invariant moment. Let me end this review, then, by listing some relevant features of eighteenth-century religion in England that might allow us to take Bowden’s contribution further (and which also resist some of the implications of recent Anglican church history): 1. The autonomy (bar patronage dependencies) of parish governance and income streams, which positioned the beneficed parson...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,926
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,014
Tête enseignante GPT0,216
Écart entre enseignants0,202 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2009
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueEighteenth-Century FictionMême sujetMedieval Literature and HistoryTravaux en français237 207