MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2047200464 · doi:10.1353/ecf.0.0086

Yorick’s Congregation: The Church of England in the Time of Laurence Sterne (review)

2009· article· en· W2047200464 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Simon During

Bibliographic record

VenueEighteenth-Century Fiction · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedieval Literature and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScholarshipArgument (complex analysis)ReinterpretationAppealInterpretation (philosophy)Performance artPhilosophyArtClassicsArt historyLawPolitical scienceAesthetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Yorick’s Congregation: The Church of England in the Time of Laurence Sterne Simon During (bio) Martha E. Bowden. Yorick’s Congregation: The Church of England in the Time of Laurence Sterne. Newark: University of Delaware Press, 2007. 291pp. US$57.50. ISBN 978-0-87413-955-6. This book belongs to a mode of scholarship that was once much more common than it is today, for better or worse. Written from a position of Anglican devotion, it aims to provide Laurence Sterne’s readers with a general, if miscellaneous, understanding of eighteenth-century Anglicanism. That understanding is indeed, as Martha Bowden makes clear, more relevant to Sterne’s fiction than is apparent from much secular scholarship. This, then, is more a work of loving contextualization than of argument or reinterpretation, which is not to say that it fails to make any gestures towards interpretation that fall under two not especially compatible heads. On the one hand, it calls upon Jonathan Lamb’s “double principle” to defend Sterne as a man involved in a dangerous balancing act between his orthodox and heterodox impulses; and it cites the interest and danger of that performance as key to his appeal. In making this move, Bowden also argues that Sterne, as person and as writer, was “genuinely” sentimental and that incidents such as the Maria incident in A Sentimental Journey are (against Thomas Keymer) not to be read as parody. For my own money, a better understanding of Sterne’s sentimentalism is that it exists in an indeterminate space between sincerity and parody, one that is ultimately independent of authorial intention and is probably constitutive of the eighteenth-century culture of sensibility more generally. On the other hand, Bowden suggests that Tristram Shandy presents a “Shandean Liturgy,” with the implication that the text’s formal innovations, along with its description of the Shandy family, belong to the culture of eighteenth-century Anglican practice and ritualism. This is an arresting and original insight, although further efforts of theorization and exposition than those available here are required to see how far it can take us into Sterne’s writing. The book also aims to take advantage of recent developments in eighteenth-century Anglican historiography, namely the new consensus that the Church of England had more vitality and impact in the period than older Whiggish histories conceded. And largely on the basis of that scholarship (as well as Melvyn New’s prodigious research in his edition of Sterne’s sermons), Yorick’s Congregation [End Page 645] offers chapters on Sterne’s parish duties; the publication of his sermons; the relationship between the Church and medicine in reference to Tristram Shandy’s midwife episode; the Sterne family’s cross-generational connection to the Church (Sterne’s grandfather was a famous, hardline Tory archbishop, his uncle a zealous Whig archdeacon); English anti-Catholicism in the period; and Sterne’s descriptions of liturgy. Of the many puzzles that Sterne’s life and work present, few are more intriguing than the relationships among 1) his professional position as a rural Anglican parson; 2) his innovative, subversive, and louche texts; and 3) his embrace of metropolitan/cosmopolitan market culture and celebrity on the back of his success as an author. Put most simply, how can we make sense of the fact that the author of Tristram Shandy was an Anglican priest? Bowden’s book gives some of the information useful to help us to figure this out; but, in part because it is just too inside Anglicanism and too immersed in detail, it does not begin the task itself in any sustained way. In particular, it does not address the theopolitical structures and transformations that are so important to understanding both the Church and the literary field in the long eighteenth century. Indeed, it treats the period as a single, invariant moment. Let me end this review, then, by listing some relevant features of eighteenth-century religion in England that might allow us to take Bowden’s contribution further (and which also resist some of the implications of recent Anglican church history): 1. The autonomy (bar patronage dependencies) of parish governance and income streams, which positioned the beneficed parson...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.926
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEighteenth-Century FictionSame topicMedieval Literature and HistoryFrench-language works237,207