MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2048007155 · doi:10.1353/bhm.2006.0103

J. B. Collip and the Development of Medical Research in Canada: Extracts and Enterprise (review)

2006· article· en· W2048007155 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Heather MacDougall

Notice bibliographique

RevueBulletin of the history of medicine · 2006
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueHistory of Medical Practice
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBattleLibrary scienceQueen (butterfly)LawSociologyMedicineManagementHistoryPolitical scienceComputer science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: J. B. Collip and the Development of Medical Research in Canada: Extracts and Enterprise Heather MacDougall Alison Li . J. B. Collip and the Development of Medical Research in Canada: Extracts and Enterprise. McGill-Queen's Associated Medical Services (Hannah Institute) Studies in the History of Medicine, no. 18. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press, 2003. xxvi + 244 pp. Ill. $39.95 (0-7735-2609-9). James Bertram Collip was the brilliant young biochemist from the University of Alberta whose scientific expertise contributed to the purification of insulin. As the fourth member of the team that discovered this life-saving therapeutic, he has long awaited an official biography. In J. B. Collip and the Development of Medical Research in Canada, Alison Li not only provides his life story but also presents a cogent analysis of the evolution of medical research in Canada. By combining the major events of Collip's career with a careful assessment of the challenges facing researchers looking for funds to support their work in an era prior to the advent of significant governmental support, she clearly demonstrates that current [End Page 599] controversies over university-corporate links and the never-ending battle between basic and applied research have deep roots. After completing his undergraduate studies in science at the University of Toronto, Collip chose to pursue graduate studies in biochemistry—a new field. In 1915 he took up his first academic appointment at the two-year-old University of Alberta Medical School. During his first travelling fellowship, he arrived in Toronto to work at his alma mater and became part of the most momentous discovery in the history of Canadian medical science. The Nobel Prize and the conflict and controversy around the discovery forever marked Collip's approach to research and led him to complete a medical degree in order to become a pioneer in Canadian medical research. But perhaps the most important lessons that he learned were the need for sustained funding and the role of competition in the research enterprise. More fortunate than most of his contemporaries, Collip was able to use his share of the royalties from the insulin patent as the basis for expanding his research program, facilities, and staff. Even after he joined both McGill (1928–47) and the University of Western Ontario (1947–65), he was able to draw on these funds. This money, as well as significant support from generous donors during the 1930s, enabled Collip to continue his research into parathyroid and placental hormones. But the presence of competing researchers, and the challenge of working with pharmaceutical companies to develop therapeutic but commercially viable applications, illustrated the range of difficulties facing even a researcher of Collip's stature. Collip was a leader in creating bench science as a university discipline, and his relationships with various department heads, deans, and university presidents therefore offer useful lessons in tactics and strategy for modern researchers. Based on the evidence provided, he was so convinced of the rightness of his approach that he made demands that lesser scientists could not have hoped to have fulfilled, and generally administrators accepted his requests. One exception was the Rockefeller Foundation's refusal to support the creation of an endocrinology research institute at McGill in the 1930s: for once, not only was Collip out of synch with the philanthropic milieu, but his eclectic approach to investigating research problems was seen as a failing rather than a strength. In the late 1930s Canada began to recognize the central role that basic scientific research would play in health care and other fields, and a medical committee under the direction of Sir Frederick Banting was created within the National Research Council (NRC). After Banting's death in 1941, Collip was appointed committee chair and he directed the Canadian war effort while liaising with British and American research groups. After the war, he continued to work for the development of a national funding body but did not return to his own research, choosing instead to move to the University of Western Ontario as the dean of medicine. Fundamentally a creator and innovator, Collip wanted the challenge of molding a small faculty into a research powerhouse. As this well-written...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,010
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,825
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0100,005
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,004
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,044
Tête enseignante GPT0,304
Écart entre enseignants0,261 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2006
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBulletin of the history of medicineMême sujetHistory of Medical PracticeTravaux en français237 207