MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2048007155 · doi:10.1353/bhm.2006.0103

J. B. Collip and the Development of Medical Research in Canada: Extracts and Enterprise (review)

2006· article· en· W2048007155 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Heather MacDougall

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin of the history of medicine · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHistory of Medical Practice
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBattleLibrary scienceQueen (butterfly)LawSociologyMedicineManagementHistoryPolitical scienceComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: J. B. Collip and the Development of Medical Research in Canada: Extracts and Enterprise Heather MacDougall Alison Li . J. B. Collip and the Development of Medical Research in Canada: Extracts and Enterprise. McGill-Queen's Associated Medical Services (Hannah Institute) Studies in the History of Medicine, no. 18. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press, 2003. xxvi + 244 pp. Ill. $39.95 (0-7735-2609-9). James Bertram Collip was the brilliant young biochemist from the University of Alberta whose scientific expertise contributed to the purification of insulin. As the fourth member of the team that discovered this life-saving therapeutic, he has long awaited an official biography. In J. B. Collip and the Development of Medical Research in Canada, Alison Li not only provides his life story but also presents a cogent analysis of the evolution of medical research in Canada. By combining the major events of Collip's career with a careful assessment of the challenges facing researchers looking for funds to support their work in an era prior to the advent of significant governmental support, she clearly demonstrates that current [End Page 599] controversies over university-corporate links and the never-ending battle between basic and applied research have deep roots. After completing his undergraduate studies in science at the University of Toronto, Collip chose to pursue graduate studies in biochemistry—a new field. In 1915 he took up his first academic appointment at the two-year-old University of Alberta Medical School. During his first travelling fellowship, he arrived in Toronto to work at his alma mater and became part of the most momentous discovery in the history of Canadian medical science. The Nobel Prize and the conflict and controversy around the discovery forever marked Collip's approach to research and led him to complete a medical degree in order to become a pioneer in Canadian medical research. But perhaps the most important lessons that he learned were the need for sustained funding and the role of competition in the research enterprise. More fortunate than most of his contemporaries, Collip was able to use his share of the royalties from the insulin patent as the basis for expanding his research program, facilities, and staff. Even after he joined both McGill (1928–47) and the University of Western Ontario (1947–65), he was able to draw on these funds. This money, as well as significant support from generous donors during the 1930s, enabled Collip to continue his research into parathyroid and placental hormones. But the presence of competing researchers, and the challenge of working with pharmaceutical companies to develop therapeutic but commercially viable applications, illustrated the range of difficulties facing even a researcher of Collip's stature. Collip was a leader in creating bench science as a university discipline, and his relationships with various department heads, deans, and university presidents therefore offer useful lessons in tactics and strategy for modern researchers. Based on the evidence provided, he was so convinced of the rightness of his approach that he made demands that lesser scientists could not have hoped to have fulfilled, and generally administrators accepted his requests. One exception was the Rockefeller Foundation's refusal to support the creation of an endocrinology research institute at McGill in the 1930s: for once, not only was Collip out of synch with the philanthropic milieu, but his eclectic approach to investigating research problems was seen as a failing rather than a strength. In the late 1930s Canada began to recognize the central role that basic scientific research would play in health care and other fields, and a medical committee under the direction of Sir Frederick Banting was created within the National Research Council (NRC). After Banting's death in 1941, Collip was appointed committee chair and he directed the Canadian war effort while liaising with British and American research groups. After the war, he continued to work for the development of a national funding body but did not return to his own research, choosing instead to move to the University of Western Ontario as the dean of medicine. Fundamentally a creator and innovator, Collip wanted the challenge of molding a small faculty into a research powerhouse. As this well-written...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.825
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBulletin of the history of medicineSame topicHistory of Medical PracticeFrench-language works237,207