MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2048499527 · doi:10.1353/his.0.0096

Artisans of the Body in Early Modern Italy: Identities, Families, and Masculinities (review)

2009· article· en· W2048499527 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Elizabeth S. Cohen

Notice bibliographique

RevueHistoire sociale · 2009
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
ThématiqueHistorical Economic and Social Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésKinshipRelevance (law)HierarchyGender studiesSociologyBeautyIdentity (music)HistoryArtAnthropologyAestheticsPolitical scienceLaw

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Artisans of the Body in Early Modern Italy: Identities, Families, and Masculinities Elizabeth S. Cohen Cavallo, Sandra — Artisans of the Body in Early Modern Italy: Identities, Families, and Masculinities. Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press, 2007. Pp. 281. Sandra Cavallo's fine monograph about seventeenth- and eighteenth-century barber surgeons in Turin, Italy, delivers rich lessons for historians of many interests. With its broad social and cultural compass, the book represents a "new" history of medicine. At the same time, the author boldly takes on several truisms dear to social and economic historians and complicates them with much original insight. Incorporating nuanced ideas about kinship, life cycles, and informal networks, she lays out a lucid picture of overlooked dimensions of an early modern artisan world. Although dense with archival detail and attentive to Italian particularities, Cavallo's vision has broader ramifications. Her comparisons on many points with other parts of Europe enhance this wider relevance. Furthermore, Cavallo infuses these social and professional themes with fresh attention to culture and gender, especially masculine identities. The book's title posits a novel way to conceptualize early modern occupational collectivity. Artisans of the Body were men who practised a variety of, to us moderns, unrelated trades, from surgeons and barbers to wigmakers, tailors, jewellers, and upholsterers. For Cavallo, the Turin surgeons belonged less to a hierarchy of medical professionals than to a horizontal grouping of artisansal occupations that shared a dedication to the care of the bodily health, hygiene, comfort, and beauty of their clientele. To the early modern mind, the inner and the outer person, the healthy parts and the imperfect ones, were best tended together. As Cavallo shows, these allied artisans fashioned extensive social and professional ties — among trades, within neighbourhoods, through marriage, and across generations. Yet, in her view, neither conventional patrilineal families, nor institutions like guilds or licensing colleges, but instead informally mediated cultural affinities created and sustained these critical occupational networks. According to the introduction, a succinct rendering of the book's central insights and methods, the initial project was to put the much-neglected surgeons back into the story of medical practice. Concerning the pre-modern world, the medical historiography distinguishes book-learned physicians, who cognitively [End Page 490] diagnosed the body's inner woes by outward signs, from hands-on barbersurgeons, who pulled teeth, set bones, and treated wounds, as well as shaving and cutting hair. This distinction and the associated hierarchy of status are the first pieces of conventional wisdom that Cavallo unsettles. For the period circa 1650–1750, a differentiation between physicians and surgeons by knowledge and culture seems not to have held. Furthermore, the presumed superiority of the physician's economic and social assets was not clear in Turin, where a prominent minority of surgeons and other artisans of the body regularly served in the several households of the court of Savoy. Nonetheless, the sources show few professional or social links between surgeons and physicians, and thick networks among Cavallo's "artisans of the body." To reconstruct surgeons' professional and personal lives, Cavallo worked from two Turin registers, dating just before and after 1700, and organized her medley of economic and social data biographically. This approach allowed her to track individuals through both time and space, to build genealogies (including women), to recreate residential geographies, and to follow alliances and partnerships, marital as well as professional, with other artisans of the body. The multiplicity of these linkages and their convergence into layered networks provide the evidentiary core of Cavallo's careful arguments. This methodology does not provide statistical averages of "typical" behaviour. Instead, prominent persons in a group appear more often in the documents and so claim the historian's eye. Here, for example, we see much of those men who attended — in rotation — the court of Savoy or held municipal or military posts, these institutions having kept the best records of surgeons' service. We see less clearly ordinary practitioners who never rose to the top of the profession. Nevertheless, patient reconstruction of several-staged careers helps Cavallo fill in the experiences of those of more modest fortunes. Tracing an array of alternative pathways, she seeks to override falsely simple...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,006
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,020

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0030,004
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0020,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0060,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,019
Tête enseignante GPT0,198
Écart entre enseignants0,179 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2009
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueHistoire socialeMême sujetHistorical Economic and Social StudiesTravaux en français237 207