MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2048499527 · doi:10.1353/his.0.0096

Artisans of the Body in Early Modern Italy: Identities, Families, and Masculinities (review)

2009· article· en· W2048499527 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Elizabeth S. Cohen

Bibliographic record

VenueHistoire sociale · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHistorical Economic and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKinshipRelevance (law)HierarchyGender studiesSociologyBeautyIdentity (music)HistoryArtAnthropologyAestheticsPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Artisans of the Body in Early Modern Italy: Identities, Families, and Masculinities Elizabeth S. Cohen Cavallo, Sandra — Artisans of the Body in Early Modern Italy: Identities, Families, and Masculinities. Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press, 2007. Pp. 281. Sandra Cavallo's fine monograph about seventeenth- and eighteenth-century barber surgeons in Turin, Italy, delivers rich lessons for historians of many interests. With its broad social and cultural compass, the book represents a "new" history of medicine. At the same time, the author boldly takes on several truisms dear to social and economic historians and complicates them with much original insight. Incorporating nuanced ideas about kinship, life cycles, and informal networks, she lays out a lucid picture of overlooked dimensions of an early modern artisan world. Although dense with archival detail and attentive to Italian particularities, Cavallo's vision has broader ramifications. Her comparisons on many points with other parts of Europe enhance this wider relevance. Furthermore, Cavallo infuses these social and professional themes with fresh attention to culture and gender, especially masculine identities. The book's title posits a novel way to conceptualize early modern occupational collectivity. Artisans of the Body were men who practised a variety of, to us moderns, unrelated trades, from surgeons and barbers to wigmakers, tailors, jewellers, and upholsterers. For Cavallo, the Turin surgeons belonged less to a hierarchy of medical professionals than to a horizontal grouping of artisansal occupations that shared a dedication to the care of the bodily health, hygiene, comfort, and beauty of their clientele. To the early modern mind, the inner and the outer person, the healthy parts and the imperfect ones, were best tended together. As Cavallo shows, these allied artisans fashioned extensive social and professional ties — among trades, within neighbourhoods, through marriage, and across generations. Yet, in her view, neither conventional patrilineal families, nor institutions like guilds or licensing colleges, but instead informally mediated cultural affinities created and sustained these critical occupational networks. According to the introduction, a succinct rendering of the book's central insights and methods, the initial project was to put the much-neglected surgeons back into the story of medical practice. Concerning the pre-modern world, the medical historiography distinguishes book-learned physicians, who cognitively [End Page 490] diagnosed the body's inner woes by outward signs, from hands-on barbersurgeons, who pulled teeth, set bones, and treated wounds, as well as shaving and cutting hair. This distinction and the associated hierarchy of status are the first pieces of conventional wisdom that Cavallo unsettles. For the period circa 1650–1750, a differentiation between physicians and surgeons by knowledge and culture seems not to have held. Furthermore, the presumed superiority of the physician's economic and social assets was not clear in Turin, where a prominent minority of surgeons and other artisans of the body regularly served in the several households of the court of Savoy. Nonetheless, the sources show few professional or social links between surgeons and physicians, and thick networks among Cavallo's "artisans of the body." To reconstruct surgeons' professional and personal lives, Cavallo worked from two Turin registers, dating just before and after 1700, and organized her medley of economic and social data biographically. This approach allowed her to track individuals through both time and space, to build genealogies (including women), to recreate residential geographies, and to follow alliances and partnerships, marital as well as professional, with other artisans of the body. The multiplicity of these linkages and their convergence into layered networks provide the evidentiary core of Cavallo's careful arguments. This methodology does not provide statistical averages of "typical" behaviour. Instead, prominent persons in a group appear more often in the documents and so claim the historian's eye. Here, for example, we see much of those men who attended — in rotation — the court of Savoy or held municipal or military posts, these institutions having kept the best records of surgeons' service. We see less clearly ordinary practitioners who never rose to the top of the profession. Nevertheless, patient reconstruction of several-staged careers helps Cavallo fill in the experiences of those of more modest fortunes. Tracing an array of alternative pathways, she seeks to override falsely simple...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHistoire socialeSame topicHistorical Economic and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207