Great Despair Meets Hopeful: Kristevan Readings in Adolescent Fiction (review)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: Great Despair Meets Hopeful: Kristevan Readings in Adolescent Fiction Karen Coats (bio) Great Despair Meets Hopeful: Kristevan Readings in Adolescent Fiction. By Martha Westwater. Edmonton: U of Alberta P, 2000 Since the dearth of genuinely theoretical reflection on Young Adult literature was noted by Caroline Hunt in 1996, several book-length studies have appeared on the subject. Disturbing the Universe: Power and Repression in Adolescent Literature, by Roberta Seelinger Trites, provides a lively and comprehensive Foucauldian account of the mechanisms and effects of power that an adolescent must confront on his or her way to adulthood. Robyn McCallum's Ideologies of Identity in Adolescent Fiction: The Dialogic Construction of Subjectivity employs the theories of Mikhail Bakhtin to investigate the ways adolescents both resist and are interpellated by the authoritative discourses of their culture. Most recently, Great Despair Meets Hopeful: Kristevan Readings in Adolescent Fiction, by Martha Westwater, is concerned with the adolescent's neverending creation and recreation of the self, that is, with the persistence of hope in the face of sadness and despair, as it is articulated through the theory of Julia Kristeva. Kristeva seems uniquely suited for the study of adolescent fiction, because, as Westwater notes, she contends that "the novelistic genre itself is largely tributary to the 'adolescent' economy of writing" (11). That is, the novel as a formal genre has always been concerned with the writing-subject (Kristeva's word for author) and the reading-subject as open systems, works-in-progress, which are in turn specific traits of adolescent identity. And while the adolescent may "mirror...the malaise of our society" (11), Kristeva believes that literature can have the distinct therapeutic effect of moving us away from narcissism, through despair, and on to the love and hope that comes from embracing alterity within ourselves. Thus, "Kristevan theory favours life and engenders hope" (xviii), characteristics that Westwater also finds, through her Kristevan readings, in the books that she studies. Westwater selects six award-winning but controversial authors and pairs them with specific Kristevan concepts in order to extend (and sometimes explode) the usual "common sense" readings of their works in the direction of a hope that she finds implicit in each. For example, she shows how the semiotic valuation of nature and spirituality makes itself heard within, through, and against the symbolic in the works of Patricia Wrightson. Kristeva's concept of the chora as both liminal and healing maternal space emerges as a site of renewal for Kevin Major's characters who are caught in the breakdowns of familial and social relationships. Westwater locates abjection, "that fundamental, necessary, unrepresentable moment of separation from the mother's body in which subjectivity is first structured and then destabilized" in the novels of Katherine Paterson (65). The role of love in the passage through adolescent melancholy and depression is beautifully demonstrated through the works of Aidan Chambers. Robert Cormier's work is read through the Kristevan lens of monumental time and the necessity of forgiveness. Jan Mark is shown, like Kristeva, to celebrate the chimerical nature of the subject-in-process. Finally, Westwater ends with a discussion of the "felt time" of the imagination each writer displays, which has the power to "offset the disappointments of present reality" (165). Each of the chapters moves delicately and dexterously through both the novels and the theory, crafting subtle readings that are compelling in their elegance and their profoundly moral vision. Westwater's rigorous engagement with difficult material and difficult theory clearly demonstrates something that I can only call love throughout this book—love for the literature and love for its intended audience. [End Page 214] If I were to have a caution for readers of the book it would be located in the desire we sometimes have for ready detachability. That is, Westwater's own engagement with Kristevan thought is so deep and broad, and her understandings and explanations of the various concepts that I have sketched above are so embedded in the readings of particular texts, that it would be difficult for a person new to or unfamiliar with Kristeva to separate the two. Thus, the virtuosity with which Westwater offers her readings seems singular and perhaps...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,006 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,010 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».