410 USE OF SPERMATOZOA AS VECTORS OF EXOGENOUS DNA FOR <i>IN VITRO</i> PRODUCTION OF BOVINE TRANSGENIC EMBRYOS
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
There are many methods to produce transgenic animals, although when considering bovine species, those methods offer low repeatability, high costs, and low transgene integration efficiency. To overcome these difficulties, sperm mediated gene transfer (SMGT) could be used as an alternative to produce transgenic embryos. This technology allows carrying exogenous DNA into the oocyte during the fertilization period, once spontaneous binding exists between spermatozoa and exogenous DNA. The aim of this study was to compare 4 methods for incorporating DNA into sperm cells—sperm incubation, capacitation, electroporation, and lipofection—to verify the efficiency of embryo production with exogenous DNA, employing spermatozoa as a vector. Cumulus–oocyte complexes (COCs) from abattoir-derived bovine ovaries were randomly divided into 5 groups (4 experimental groups: sperm incubation, sperm capacitation with calcium ionophore, electroporation, and lipofection; and 1 control group). In vitro maturation was performed in TCM-199 medium supplemented with 10% FCS, sodium pyruvate, gentamycin, FSH, hCG, and estradiol in an incubator at 39°C, in an atmosphere of 5% CO2 in air and high humidity for 24 h. After Percoll gradient (45/90%) separation at 600 g for 30 min, spermatozoa were washed in Talp Semen medium (200 g for 5 min). For in vitro fertilization (IVF), 5 × 106 spermatozoa were used to inseminate microdroplets with 20 matured oocytes from all groups: incubation with exogenous DNA for 1 h, sperm capacitation (250 nM of calcium ionophore) for 5 min followed by sperm incubation for 1 h, electroporation (500V), and lipofection (Effectene®; Qiagen, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada). The EYFP-Nuc plasmid (500 ng mL-1; Clontech, Mountain View, CA, USA) was used as exogenous DNA. Oocytes inseminated with non-treated sperm were considered as the control group. The presumptive zygotes were co-cultured with a granulosa cell monolayer in SOFaa medium in an incubator at 39°C, with an atmosphere of 5% CO2 in air and high humidity. The blastocyst rate was analyzed by ANOVA. Embryos from all experimental and control groups were subjected to PCR to detect internalized EYFP, using primers specific to this exogenous DNA, and considering positive embryos those that showed a fragment of 440 bp after electrophoresis. The fragment of 440 bp from positive embryos was sequenced to check correspondence to the EYFP. Electroporation (17.95%) and sperm capacitation (15.12%) were more efficient for EYFP-positive embryo production when compared to the lipofection protocol (6.25%). Sperm incubation (12.5%) did not show a significant difference from the other groups. Sequenced PCR-positive products for EYFP showed 100% homology with nucleotides of EYFP at GenBank. In conclusion, it is possible to use SMGT to deliver exogenous DNA into an oocyte at the time of IVF. This work was supported financially FAPESP 03/08542-5 and 03/07456-8 .
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».