MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2050467243 · doi:10.1071/rdv19n1ab410

410 USE OF SPERMATOZOA AS VECTORS OF EXOGENOUS DNA FOR <i>IN VITRO</i> PRODUCTION OF BOVINE TRANSGENIC EMBRYOS

2006· article· en· W2050467243 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Renata Simões, Mário Binelli, A. C. Nicacio, Marcella Pecora Milazzotto, Weber Beringui Feitosa, J. A. Visintin, Mayra Elena Ortiz D’Ávila Assumpção

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAnimal Genetics and Reproduction
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCapacitationSpermAndrologyBiologyExogenous DNAElectroporationHuman fertilizationIncubationSemenTransgeneEmbryoOocyteMolecular biologyDNABiochemistryAnatomyCell biologyGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There are many methods to produce transgenic animals, although when considering bovine species, those methods offer low repeatability, high costs, and low transgene integration efficiency. To overcome these difficulties, sperm mediated gene transfer (SMGT) could be used as an alternative to produce transgenic embryos. This technology allows carrying exogenous DNA into the oocyte during the fertilization period, once spontaneous binding exists between spermatozoa and exogenous DNA. The aim of this study was to compare 4 methods for incorporating DNA into sperm cells—sperm incubation, capacitation, electroporation, and lipofection—to verify the efficiency of embryo production with exogenous DNA, employing spermatozoa as a vector. Cumulus–oocyte complexes (COCs) from abattoir-derived bovine ovaries were randomly divided into 5 groups (4 experimental groups: sperm incubation, sperm capacitation with calcium ionophore, electroporation, and lipofection; and 1 control group). In vitro maturation was performed in TCM-199 medium supplemented with 10% FCS, sodium pyruvate, gentamycin, FSH, hCG, and estradiol in an incubator at 39°C, in an atmosphere of 5% CO2 in air and high humidity for 24 h. After Percoll gradient (45/90%) separation at 600 g for 30 min, spermatozoa were washed in Talp Semen medium (200 g for 5 min). For in vitro fertilization (IVF), 5 × 106 spermatozoa were used to inseminate microdroplets with 20 matured oocytes from all groups: incubation with exogenous DNA for 1 h, sperm capacitation (250 nM of calcium ionophore) for 5 min followed by sperm incubation for 1 h, electroporation (500V), and lipofection (Effectene®; Qiagen, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada). The EYFP-Nuc plasmid (500 ng mL-1; Clontech, Mountain View, CA, USA) was used as exogenous DNA. Oocytes inseminated with non-treated sperm were considered as the control group. The presumptive zygotes were co-cultured with a granulosa cell monolayer in SOFaa medium in an incubator at 39°C, with an atmosphere of 5% CO2 in air and high humidity. The blastocyst rate was analyzed by ANOVA. Embryos from all experimental and control groups were subjected to PCR to detect internalized EYFP, using primers specific to this exogenous DNA, and considering positive embryos those that showed a fragment of 440 bp after electrophoresis. The fragment of 440 bp from positive embryos was sequenced to check correspondence to the EYFP. Electroporation (17.95%) and sperm capacitation (15.12%) were more efficient for EYFP-positive embryo production when compared to the lipofection protocol (6.25%). Sperm incubation (12.5%) did not show a significant difference from the other groups. Sequenced PCR-positive products for EYFP showed 100% homology with nucleotides of EYFP at GenBank. In conclusion, it is possible to use SMGT to deliver exogenous DNA into an oocyte at the time of IVF. This work was supported financially FAPESP 03/08542-5 and 03/07456-8 .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.114
Threshold uncertainty score0.517

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentSame topicAnimal Genetics and ReproductionFrench-language works237,207