MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2050507637 · doi:10.4103/0970-9185.150574

In-plane interscalene block: A word of caution

2015· article· en· W2050507637 sur OpenAlexaff
Herman Sehmbi, UshmaJ Shah

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology · 2015
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueNerve Injury and Rehabilitation
Établissements canadiensToronto Western Hospital
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineAnatomyScapulaBrachial plexusDry needlingSternumRib cageAcupuncture

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Sir, Ultrasound guided interscalene block is one of the most commonly performed blocks with both in-plane and out-of-plane approaches to the brachial plexus being described. The in-plane technique can be performed from lateral to medial needling or vice versa, with each approach having its own merits. Through this letter, we wish to highlight the potential avoidable, but disastrous complications of in-plane needling technique. Lateral to medial direction of needling, while performing an in-plane interscalene block results in a slight caudal needle entry when compared with the classical “Winnie” technique and makes traversing through the Middle scalene muscle, a technical necessity.[1] Hence, the dorsal scapular nerve (DSN) and the long thoracic nerve (LTN) which course through this muscle may be put at an unnecessary risk of unrecognised needle trauma if one fails to identify them on ultrasound scan. The DSN originates from C5 to possibly C6, pierces the middle scalene muscle to traverse anteriorly under the levator scapulae (elevates the scapula) which it innervates and descends to innervate the rhomboids (pulls the scapula medially). Injury to this nerve causes the DSN syndrome, which presents as a dull ache along the medial border of scapula and pain radiating to the arm and forearm. This is accompanied by the atrophy and weakening of the supplied muscles.[2] The LTN originates from C5, C6 and possibly C7, pierces the middle scalene muscle lying below the DSN, courses away from the brachial plexus behind the axillary vessels to lie on the serratus anterior muscle which it supplies. The LTN injury thus results in shoulder pain and winging of scapula.[3] Hanson and Auyong have shown in their prospective study that either of these nerves can be visualized in over 90% cases, this must be done proactively to avoid injury.[4] Their appearance is predominantly hyperechoic with areas of hypoechoic fascicles within them [Figure 1]. Since no outcome data describing injury to these nerves are available apart from case reports, no technical guidelines are in place to ensure avoidance of this event.[5] Perhaps following a shallower needle trajectory to avoid entering the bulk of middle scalene muscle, using a peripheral nerve stimulator to identify proximity to these nerves and their proactive identification may constitute a safer methodology.Figure 1: Yellow outline demarcates the brachial plexus at C6. White arrows point towards respective nerves. SCM — Sternocleidomastoid muscle, ASM — Anterior scalene muscle, MSM — Middle scalene muscle, DSN — Dorsal scapular nerve, LTN — Long thoracic nerveSimilarly, the medial to lateral in-plane needling at interscalene level is fraught with injury to the phrenic nerve as it may lie in the path of the needle trajectory. Phrenic nerve originates from C3 to C5 and lies in close proximity to C5 at the cricoid level before descending medially over the belly of anterior scalene muscle as it courses caudally. Kessler et al. have shown in their volunteer study that it is visible as a predominantly hypoechoic structure with hyperechoic border [Figure 2] in over 90% of the cases.[6] Failure to identify this nerve during this approach risks its injury that may present as delayed persistent respiratory compromise.[7] Thus, proactive identification of phrenic nerve, use of a nerve stimulator and using a safe trajectory (once phrenic nerve is away from C5) would be the best approach in this case.Figure 2: Yellow outline demarcates the brachial plexus at C6. White arrow points towards phrenic nerve. SCM — Sternocleidomastoid muscle, ASM — Anterior scalene muscle, MSM — Middle scalene muscleOut of plane needling may provide a safer route to the brachial plexus at interscalene area. This typically involves needle insertion and deposition of local anesthetic on either side of the brachial plexus. However, a medial needle insertion may damage phrenic nerve if a proximal higher site of needling is selected, when the phrenic nerve emerges from the C5 nerve root on its medial side. Thus avoiding a medial needling altogether or choosing a sufficiently distal point for out of plane needling when phrenic nerve is away from C5 root, is the safest option in our view. Although we have not encountered such injuries to the brachial plexus in our clinical practice, the possibility still exists. To conclude an effort should be made to visualize these nerve, especially while placing an in-plane interscalene block irrespective of the direction of needling. Acknowledgment The images in this letter are obtained by scanning Dr. Herman Sehmbi, who volunteered and are for representation purposes only.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,192
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,293

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,067
Tête enseignante GPT0,431
Écart entre enseignants0,364 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations4
Publié2015
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of Anaesthesiology Clinical PharmacologyMême sujetNerve Injury and RehabilitationTravaux en français237 207