MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2050507637 · doi:10.4103/0970-9185.150574

In-plane interscalene block: A word of caution

2015· article· en· W2050507637 on OpenAlexaff
Herman Sehmbi, UshmaJ Shah

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNerve Injury and Rehabilitation
Canadian institutionsToronto Western Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAnatomyScapulaBrachial plexusDry needlingSternumRib cageAcupuncture

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sir, Ultrasound guided interscalene block is one of the most commonly performed blocks with both in-plane and out-of-plane approaches to the brachial plexus being described. The in-plane technique can be performed from lateral to medial needling or vice versa, with each approach having its own merits. Through this letter, we wish to highlight the potential avoidable, but disastrous complications of in-plane needling technique. Lateral to medial direction of needling, while performing an in-plane interscalene block results in a slight caudal needle entry when compared with the classical “Winnie” technique and makes traversing through the Middle scalene muscle, a technical necessity.[1] Hence, the dorsal scapular nerve (DSN) and the long thoracic nerve (LTN) which course through this muscle may be put at an unnecessary risk of unrecognised needle trauma if one fails to identify them on ultrasound scan. The DSN originates from C5 to possibly C6, pierces the middle scalene muscle to traverse anteriorly under the levator scapulae (elevates the scapula) which it innervates and descends to innervate the rhomboids (pulls the scapula medially). Injury to this nerve causes the DSN syndrome, which presents as a dull ache along the medial border of scapula and pain radiating to the arm and forearm. This is accompanied by the atrophy and weakening of the supplied muscles.[2] The LTN originates from C5, C6 and possibly C7, pierces the middle scalene muscle lying below the DSN, courses away from the brachial plexus behind the axillary vessels to lie on the serratus anterior muscle which it supplies. The LTN injury thus results in shoulder pain and winging of scapula.[3] Hanson and Auyong have shown in their prospective study that either of these nerves can be visualized in over 90% cases, this must be done proactively to avoid injury.[4] Their appearance is predominantly hyperechoic with areas of hypoechoic fascicles within them [Figure 1]. Since no outcome data describing injury to these nerves are available apart from case reports, no technical guidelines are in place to ensure avoidance of this event.[5] Perhaps following a shallower needle trajectory to avoid entering the bulk of middle scalene muscle, using a peripheral nerve stimulator to identify proximity to these nerves and their proactive identification may constitute a safer methodology.Figure 1: Yellow outline demarcates the brachial plexus at C6. White arrows point towards respective nerves. SCM — Sternocleidomastoid muscle, ASM — Anterior scalene muscle, MSM — Middle scalene muscle, DSN — Dorsal scapular nerve, LTN — Long thoracic nerveSimilarly, the medial to lateral in-plane needling at interscalene level is fraught with injury to the phrenic nerve as it may lie in the path of the needle trajectory. Phrenic nerve originates from C3 to C5 and lies in close proximity to C5 at the cricoid level before descending medially over the belly of anterior scalene muscle as it courses caudally. Kessler et al. have shown in their volunteer study that it is visible as a predominantly hypoechoic structure with hyperechoic border [Figure 2] in over 90% of the cases.[6] Failure to identify this nerve during this approach risks its injury that may present as delayed persistent respiratory compromise.[7] Thus, proactive identification of phrenic nerve, use of a nerve stimulator and using a safe trajectory (once phrenic nerve is away from C5) would be the best approach in this case.Figure 2: Yellow outline demarcates the brachial plexus at C6. White arrow points towards phrenic nerve. SCM — Sternocleidomastoid muscle, ASM — Anterior scalene muscle, MSM — Middle scalene muscleOut of plane needling may provide a safer route to the brachial plexus at interscalene area. This typically involves needle insertion and deposition of local anesthetic on either side of the brachial plexus. However, a medial needle insertion may damage phrenic nerve if a proximal higher site of needling is selected, when the phrenic nerve emerges from the C5 nerve root on its medial side. Thus avoiding a medial needling altogether or choosing a sufficiently distal point for out of plane needling when phrenic nerve is away from C5 root, is the safest option in our view. Although we have not encountered such injuries to the brachial plexus in our clinical practice, the possibility still exists. To conclude an effort should be made to visualize these nerve, especially while placing an in-plane interscalene block irrespective of the direction of needling. Acknowledgment The images in this letter are obtained by scanning Dr. Herman Sehmbi, who volunteered and are for representation purposes only.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.192
Threshold uncertainty score0.293

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.431
Teacher spread0.364 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Anaesthesiology Clinical PharmacologySame topicNerve Injury and RehabilitationFrench-language works237,207