MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2050644043 · doi:10.1353/vcr.2010.0010

On the Sea

2010· article· en· W2050644043 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

venuePublié dans une revue dont le pays d'attache est le Canada.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueVictorian review · 2010
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueTravel Writing and Literature
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésForegroundingAestheticsPoliticsDynamismMeaning (existential)SociologyHistoryMedia studiesEpistemologyPolitical scienceLawLiteratureArtPhilosophy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

On the Sea Cannon Schmitt (bio) The wealth of attention paid to imperialism and globalization has transformed nineteenth-century studies by demonstrating the definitively global scope of Victorian geographies. Ironically, however, those approaches that seek most fundamentally to reorient our understanding of the period by foregrounding the web of cultural, commercial, political, scientific, and military connections in which Victorian Britain was enmeshed—transatlanticism and transnationalism, to name two—often end up eliding what may be the key to such reorientation: the routing of every thread in that web via the sea. The common prefix "trans-" concisely signals such elision. Meaning "across, through, over, to or on the other side of, beyond, outside of, from one place, person, thing, or state to another" ("Trans-," def. 1), "trans-" threatens to occlude that which separates one place, person, or thing from another. How might we scrutinize what these and related transisms relegate to a conceptual space between centre and periphery, developed and developing worlds, metropole and colony? What theoretical or methodological adjustments would enable us to see the sea? [End Page 20] Two potential answers emerge, each defined by the direction of the critical gaze. The first presumes a look outward from the shore that attempts to fix itself on the water. The difficulty of such an undertaking becomes evident when one notes that even the most innovative efforts at something like nineteenth-century sea studies—I am thinking especially of the indispensable work done by Samuel Baker, Cesare Casarino, and Margaret Cohen—focus less on the sea as such than on the labour and skill demanded by sailing; the congeries of races and classes gathered together for whaling or fishing; the abstractions of longitude, latitude, and triangulation necessary for navigation; and other aspects of life afloat. In short, their attention centres on that metonymy for, inversion of, and antidote to life on land, the ship. What would come into view if our eyes were lowered from the deck to the waterline? Initially, the liquid expanse that confronts us might inspire a lament similar to that of Coleridge's ancient mariner: "Water, water, every where, / Nor any drop to drink" (121-22)—or, rather, nor any thing to interpret. This in itself would be telling insofar as it echoes the absence or unthinkability of the sea in so many Victorian texts—in Dickens's novels, say, in which seafaring, while crucial to a number of them, almost always takes place offstage, in the space of narrative ellipses. Were we to keep looking, we might perceive on the surface of such elliptical oceans the site of an elusive but recuperable and (oxymoronically) profound superficial knowledge. Consider D. Graham Burnett's analysis of whalers' sketches of surfacing cetaceans in Trying Leviathan: "Everything in a whaleboat hung on the correct interpretation of the glinting forms that broke, if only for an instant, the surrounding water" (caption to Plate 17). If such a perception aligns an ocean view with that "surface reading" that Stephen Best and Sharon Marcus extol in the introduction to their recent Representations special issue, "The Way We Read Now," we should not therefore neglect the once-inaccessible depths, the habitat of fantasmatic projections like Tennyson's kraken as well as actual but no less bizarre organisms dredged up from the abyssal plain in expeditions such as that of HMS Challenger, a naval survey vessel whose 1872-76 circumnavigation marks the advent of modern oceanography. The second answer to the question of how we might begin to take sufficient account of the sea has been presaged by Ezra Pound, who, in ABC of Reading, comments that "the geography of the Odyssey is correct geography; not as you would find it if you had a geography book and a map, but as it would be in a 'periplum,' that is, as a coasting sailor would find it" (43-44). Pound refers to what is more accurately called a periplus or pilot-book, not a chart proper but a set of written directions for finding ports when at sea, one of the earliest European navigational tools. Ancient navigators put their periploi to use while on the ocean. Relocating our critico-theoretical practice likewise might produce the...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,894
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0090,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,017
Tête enseignante GPT0,226
Écart entre enseignants0,209 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle