MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2050644043 · doi:10.1353/vcr.2010.0010

On the Sea

2010· article· en· W2050644043 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueVictorian review · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTravel Writing and Literature
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsForegroundingAestheticsPoliticsDynamismMeaning (existential)SociologyHistoryMedia studiesEpistemologyPolitical scienceLawLiteratureArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

On the Sea Cannon Schmitt (bio) The wealth of attention paid to imperialism and globalization has transformed nineteenth-century studies by demonstrating the definitively global scope of Victorian geographies. Ironically, however, those approaches that seek most fundamentally to reorient our understanding of the period by foregrounding the web of cultural, commercial, political, scientific, and military connections in which Victorian Britain was enmeshed—transatlanticism and transnationalism, to name two—often end up eliding what may be the key to such reorientation: the routing of every thread in that web via the sea. The common prefix "trans-" concisely signals such elision. Meaning "across, through, over, to or on the other side of, beyond, outside of, from one place, person, thing, or state to another" ("Trans-," def. 1), "trans-" threatens to occlude that which separates one place, person, or thing from another. How might we scrutinize what these and related transisms relegate to a conceptual space between centre and periphery, developed and developing worlds, metropole and colony? What theoretical or methodological adjustments would enable us to see the sea? [End Page 20] Two potential answers emerge, each defined by the direction of the critical gaze. The first presumes a look outward from the shore that attempts to fix itself on the water. The difficulty of such an undertaking becomes evident when one notes that even the most innovative efforts at something like nineteenth-century sea studies—I am thinking especially of the indispensable work done by Samuel Baker, Cesare Casarino, and Margaret Cohen—focus less on the sea as such than on the labour and skill demanded by sailing; the congeries of races and classes gathered together for whaling or fishing; the abstractions of longitude, latitude, and triangulation necessary for navigation; and other aspects of life afloat. In short, their attention centres on that metonymy for, inversion of, and antidote to life on land, the ship. What would come into view if our eyes were lowered from the deck to the waterline? Initially, the liquid expanse that confronts us might inspire a lament similar to that of Coleridge's ancient mariner: "Water, water, every where, / Nor any drop to drink" (121-22)—or, rather, nor any thing to interpret. This in itself would be telling insofar as it echoes the absence or unthinkability of the sea in so many Victorian texts—in Dickens's novels, say, in which seafaring, while crucial to a number of them, almost always takes place offstage, in the space of narrative ellipses. Were we to keep looking, we might perceive on the surface of such elliptical oceans the site of an elusive but recuperable and (oxymoronically) profound superficial knowledge. Consider D. Graham Burnett's analysis of whalers' sketches of surfacing cetaceans in Trying Leviathan: "Everything in a whaleboat hung on the correct interpretation of the glinting forms that broke, if only for an instant, the surrounding water" (caption to Plate 17). If such a perception aligns an ocean view with that "surface reading" that Stephen Best and Sharon Marcus extol in the introduction to their recent Representations special issue, "The Way We Read Now," we should not therefore neglect the once-inaccessible depths, the habitat of fantasmatic projections like Tennyson's kraken as well as actual but no less bizarre organisms dredged up from the abyssal plain in expeditions such as that of HMS Challenger, a naval survey vessel whose 1872-76 circumnavigation marks the advent of modern oceanography. The second answer to the question of how we might begin to take sufficient account of the sea has been presaged by Ezra Pound, who, in ABC of Reading, comments that "the geography of the Odyssey is correct geography; not as you would find it if you had a geography book and a map, but as it would be in a 'periplum,' that is, as a coasting sailor would find it" (43-44). Pound refers to what is more accurately called a periplus or pilot-book, not a chart proper but a set of written directions for finding ports when at sea, one of the earliest European navigational tools. Ancient navigators put their periploi to use while on the ocean. Relocating our critico-theoretical practice likewise might produce the...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.894
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it